Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i think that base system is most animals go to lvl 5 ( rabbits, ducks, dears ... ) the danger ones go to lvl 9 ( lions. pumas. foxes... ) and the big ones too ( Red dear, moose, buffalo.. )
at least this is what i remember, but when i go for a special hunt 1st i check weight lvl class..
Next we have an animals individual level. The most significant factor we can use to determine how the animal stacks up compared to other members of its species is the weight of the animal. The bigger they are the more likely they will attain a higher score and there are fewer old and fat ones than there are young and skinny ones. There may be a few exceptional animals within a species that, while weighing less, have developed antlers, horns, fangs or skulls larger than their peers. Also, the bigger they are the tougher they are. the less tolerant to our noise and stink they are and the fewer of them there are. This makes them more difficult to find and take down with a single shot than the smaller members of their species.
It comes down to this: It's easier to find and harvest a White tailed deer with a single shot than it is a Moose. First because there are more White tailed deer than there are Moose and second because of it's size/weight it's much harder to drop a Moose with a lung shot than it is a Whitetail.
They didn't make animal levels uniform because the animals themselves are not uniform in nature.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2142108329
I would much prefer a simple 1~100 scoring system and 1~10 level system for every animal. Clearly, each animals score is relative to that animal, they don't actually NEED to be different.
Like, it's kinda crummy having to look at a guide online to see how good your kill is relative to that animals average and max. Where as, if every animal start being a diamond at say, 90 points you have a consistent frame of reference. If the max size diamond of every animal was 100 points, then if you get a diamond that is 94.2 points, you know exactly how good it is relative to the biggest or smallest a diamond for that species can be.
I was able to figure out the system without a guide or anything, but I'm 300 hours in and am use to playing much more complicated confusing games. So this is more my opinion on what's best for a general audience, than what I personally want.
The scoring should be the same for all the animals, that would be much better.
im going to assume you maybe misunderstood what i was asking about because of your comparison about the moose and whitetail at the end. i get that moose are harder to kill than whitetail which is why they are a CLASS 8 animal and the deer are only a class 4. what i wana know is how they come up with what animals go to level 5 medium or only a level 3 or up to level9 legendary. and if you did understand what i was talking about then your last paragraph about the moose and whitetail really made no sense as moose go to level 5 medium, whitetail only go level 3 very easy yet blacktail which are SMALLER than whitetail also go to level 5 Medium like the moose! and so do springbok and blackbucks which are super tiny.