Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
SRP is what i would call an "easy" map. Great for those who want to be shooting stuff every minute but probably the least "realistic" hunting experience in the game.
I'd deffo recommend Yukon out of the two, but i guess it depends on how you play the game.
If you like doing missions then it has to be Yukon. SRP has very few missions.
SRP has a very good variety of animals and outshines Yukon easily in this department.
Both are good maps and depends which your preference is, I like both of them a lot.
I really hope that devs will create flora in the new reserve with the same dedication and attention to details like they did in Silver Ridge.
SRP is also very beautiful, no question about that. I like both but Yukon is better polished while in SRP you see Mapseams everywhere, floating trails or trails that vanish when you lay down and tons of other bugs and glitches plus less missions and those that are there are bugged. Same goes for the mountain lion that likes to bug out.
Yukon is much more polished hands down.
Meaning more animals? Easier to transverse?
>>Yukon are just red bushes with the same trees everywhere, very repetitive to hunt there in my case.<<
Hmmm... this is different from previous posts in this thread. Do any of the animals eat the red bushes (grin)?
Regardless, I'm going to walk around Yukon first and see what happens. I know Hirsch so well, it's a little hard to make the change.
I was just thinking that if you only go to lakes you only keep finding drinking need zones ;)
But it could also all be coincidence and this guide is also not 100% accurate, I have found quite some needzones already of species in areas where the guide does not show them. I assume the guide is correct for the most part, but not 100%.
Maybe they should lower the duration of the drinking, no animal in the world drinks for several hours.
They should roam more instead.
It´s snipers paradise.
And about those "red bushes areas" - I know that on Alaska terrain can look like that but IMO it is bad implemented in Yukon. A large part of the map looks very similar, you just walk through the same bushes and red ground, it looks weird in my opinion and can become tiring after short time. The problem is that this "red area" is not varied at all, looks the same everywhere.
I must agree with others that weather changes and snow failing is nicely done.
Those are the highest resolution maps I've seen yet, major tkx. I also found this but I wonder if depending on all these info packages aren't taking from realism:
https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/1331327250927599459/02C4E102F4ED3B980A9C9095E251C5B395490DE5/