Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=867975214
I've never hunt in real life but I've been in the militairy for 8 years and only got experience with these 2 guns, the Dimaco C7 and AR-15 and the penetration looks fine to me
As Jack O’Connor the champion of the .270 said...You can kill almost any game animal in North America with a .270 and the right bullet. I shoot a .270WSM with a 140gn Nosler Partition and love it. In real life a .270 at 300 yards would pass through a Roe Deer or Fallow Deer like a hot knife through butter, bone and all.
Taking a "Texas Heart Shot" at 100 yards on a Red deer would almost, if not completely, get you a full pass through. Not endorsing any of you hunters taking a Texas Heart Shot on any game animals, just making a point about the penetration ability of the .270 with the right type and weight bullet on an animal of that size.
We are discussing how a Winchester .270 fails to exit a broadside of a medium sized animal here not blowing cervical spines out.
The hole game Underperforms.
From my experience (emergency surgery, trauma intensive care, anaesthesiology), the weapons you mention are using high speed rotation bullets, it's used in war weapons where you need to neutralize as fast as possible and forgive bad aiming. These bullets tend to change their direction as soon as they hit a solid surface, which is really deadly. I have seen 7.62 bullets entering a leg and exiting chest, and lot of damages between.
These bullets are very efficient, but also very dangerous because they can kill after hitting a wall, and you can't control them after that. I guess they're not allowed for hunting (in Europe, don't know about US) because while hunting, you don't want to shoot anyone else, and also you aim accurately and don't shoot loads of ammunitions on each preys.
These bullets can rotate (they almost all rotate nowadays, because it seems it's more accurate), but not so fast as war weapons, and hunters tend to use the less powerful ammo they can depending on targets (harvest integrity, and when you have exploded all the target's guts, i guess the meat is not so good to eat^^). So the bullet will remain mostly on a straight line (that's what happen with a 9mm for instance)
So, in my opinion, ammos got different purposes, accuracy and low lethality after some distance (in my country, 12ga is the most used weapon as hunting rifle, even slugs travel not so far) for safety in crowded hunting areas (however, the 12ga slugs can really be deadlier than a long range rifle, because a small tree won't stop a 12ga slug), and war ammos are made to kill, no matter the distance and no matter if 1/10 of the firepower is enough to kill your target. Also it's made to penetrate a bulletproof vest, actually, you need a very good protection to stop 7.62 ammos (car engine for instance). Who need this power to hunt, even mooses?
You'll still see some ammunitions behave weirdly, it's very difficult to predict what will happen after they hit something, but most of time, war bullets will change direction, transfer a lot of energy to the body (shock can kill even if it hits a limb) and will go very far after the target, when hunting bullets will be more accurate (don't compare M80A1 vs 12ga birdshot^^), won't travel far after the target (though they can still be deadly after few hundreds meters) and will remain on a straight trajectory.
It just works better.