Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I did know that you could get both a gun and a vehicle, but he was complaining just about guns. I don't recall being able to do both primary and secondary weapons, but I won't argue with you.
^ This is why double negatives are a grammatical no-no. For a good six seconds, I thought you were actually praising this game.
Yeah, this irritated the hell out of me also.
Pretty much this.
At the top of the irritation chart was the fact that they made a "new engine" when they really didn't need to. JC3's visuals were fine, and while there actually things that were improved visually, far MORE moved backward, and got WORSE.
If the engine JC3 was on was horribly outdated, it might have made sense, but it seems like it was an engine that was created for the sake of creating a new engine. I guess maybe they needed a new engine for the weather effects? Too bad the weather effects don't outweigh the backward movement.
In JC2 you feel like a powerhouse.
In this one I feel like a wimp and in the powerful ones you're always running out of ammo.