how to improve fps?

[rice]

maybe some launch commands?

[Botten Hanna]

Hi! Have you tried lowering the video settings? :)

[rice]

Originally posted by Botten Hanna:

Hi! Have you tried lowering the video settings? :)

Im just looking if theres any launch commands to improve my FPS. i have good FPS but sometimes i do really big battles with 100 people and just get stuck in 20fps

[Botten Hanna]

Originally posted by ♥♥♥♥ you psynet noobs:

Originally posted by Botten Hanna:

Hi! Have you tried lowering the video settings? :)

Im just looking if theres any launch commands to improve my FPS. i have good FPS but sometimes i do really big battles with 100 people and just get stuck in 20fps

No launch commands, did you try the in-game settings? The game isn't really meant to have huge battles, it will lag with more than a 100 on most computers.

[rice]

Originally posted by Botten Hanna:

Originally posted by ♥♥♥♥ you psynet noobs:

Im just looking if theres any launch commands to improve my FPS. i have good FPS but sometimes i do really big battles with 100 people and just get stuck in 20fps

No launch commands, did you try the in-game settings? The game isn't really meant to have huge battles, it will lag with more than a 100 on most computers.

Is there any plan on doing optimisations so you can be able to do big battles?

[Botten Hanna]

Originally posted by ♥♥♥♥ you psynet noobs:

Originally posted by Botten Hanna:

No launch commands, did you try the in-game settings? The game isn't really meant to have huge battles, it will lag with more than a 100 on most computers.

Is there any plan on doing optimisations so you can be able to do big battles?

We will do more optimization but due to the physics simulations, the game will most likely never be able to do huge battles without lag on normal computers.

[rice]

Originally posted by Botten Hanna:

Originally posted by ♥♥♥♥ you psynet noobs:

Is there any plan on doing optimisations so you can be able to do big battles?

We will do more optimization but due to the physics simulations, the game will most likely never be able to do huge battles without lag on normal computers.

Will a 10th generation nvidia card handle big battles?

[General McCreevous]

Originally posted by ♥♥♥♥ you psynet noobs:

Originally posted by Botten Hanna:

We will do more optimization but due to the physics simulations, the game will most likely never be able to do huge battles without lag on normal computers.

Will a 10th generation nvidia card handle big battles?

it's more the CPU than GPU

[moon8780]

dude here my pc:
ryzen 5 2600 6 core 12 thread cpu
16gb ram ddr4 3000mhz
radeon rx 570 4gb
im running the game on a SSD m.2

and everytime i put more than ~120 untis, the fps drops to about 20 or less..
i did a benchmark using MSI afterburner and my pc is not even using 80% of its power

so i think the problem is just the way the game is coded and we sadly can't do anything ;-;

[moon8780]

still love the game tho

[Ryedestructor]

Originally posted by Vergoin da Pofissõ:

dude here my pc:
ryzen 5 2600 6 core 12 thread cpu
16gb ram ddr4 3000mhz
radeon rx 570 4gb
im running the game on a SSD m.2

and everytime i put more than ~120 untis, the fps drops to about 20 or less..
i did a benchmark using MSI afterburner and my pc is not even using 80% of its power

so i think the problem is just the way the game is coded and we sadly can't do anything ;-;

Are y'all planning a ritual? Is the day of the dead upon us? Is the apocalypse nearing? Why are so many threads being necro'd?

[Inali]

Originally posted by Ryedestructor:

Originally posted by Vergoin da Pofissõ:

dude here my pc:
ryzen 5 2600 6 core 12 thread cpu
16gb ram ddr4 3000mhz
radeon rx 570 4gb
im running the game on a SSD m.2

and everytime i put more than ~120 untis, the fps drops to about 20 or less..
i did a benchmark using MSI afterburner and my pc is not even using 80% of its power

so i think the problem is just the way the game is coded and we sadly can't do anything ;-;

Are y'all planning a ritual? Is the day of the dead upon us? Is the apocalypse nearing? Why are so many threads being necro'd?

Who cares? People complaining about necros are the worst. Sometimes it's better to have MORE information on a thread that start new ones about the same stuff, especially when internet archiving happens.

[Ryedestructor]

Originally posted by Inali:

Originally posted by Ryedestructor:

Are y'all planning a ritual? Is the day of the dead upon us? Is the apocalypse nearing? Why are so many threads being necro'd?

Who cares? People complaining about necros are the worst. Sometimes it's better to have MORE information on a thread that start new ones about the same stuff, especially when internet archiving happens.

People who have a question should use the search bar to find old threads that relate to their issue. New threads on answered questions are only made because people are too lazy to use the search bar. Here's why I oppose necroing threads:

A. people who don't take the time to read previous comments or date of the post will frequently try to answer a question that is either wholly irrelevant due to updates, not of any importance to the original poster anymore, or already answered, possibly multiple times.

B. It buries newer, unanswered threads. If the top discussions are old ♥♥♥♥ that have already been answered, then the relevant questions with 0 comments that get shoved to the 2nd page are less likely to receive attention

C. Necroing an old discussion to add new information is not as good as simply making a new discussion with the new information. If the new information actually has value then it belongs in a fresh discussion that will actually draw attention, not in a discussion that will deter attention from people who look at the date of the post and people who don't feel like reading through all of the comments. The only time this is really justifiable is if the original question was never answered and you found a fix for OP that isn't as simple as reciting something from the patch notes.

D. Depending on the moderators for the forum, the thread has the potential to just be locked since it's old, and so any continued discussion would be cut off anyways. You might as well have just made a new discussion in that case.