All units in tabs have different purpos.prove me wrong.

[DeEznation]

They may be similar but not the same.compare two units you think don't have a different purpos and I will prove you wrong.yes I spelled it wrong, correct my grammar I don't care.

[Bagel Knackstein]

You are sort of right, but many units have different abilities and the same purpose. Example: shield bearer and protector both have the same purpose: protect with a shield. They are very different units, sure, but the purpose is the same.

[DeEznation]

Originally posted by Viper:

You are sort of right, but many units have different abilities and the same purpose. Example: shield bearer and protector both have the same purpose: protect with a shield. They are very different units, sure, but the purpose is the same.

Not exactly,I see your point but the protector is more combat then the sheild bearer.ypu can tell because the sheild is not touching or close to the ground.

[AscendedViking7]

Originally posted by Viper:

You are sort of right, but many units have different abilities and the same purpose. Example: shield bearer and protector both have the same purpose: protect with a shield. They are very different units, sure, but the purpose is the same.

What's the difference between those two units anyways?
The protector is just a little bit easier to use with Unit Possession, that's about it.

[Bagel Knackstein]

Originally posted by clambchowder:

Originally posted by Viper:

You are sort of right, but many units have different abilities and the same purpose. Example: shield bearer and protector both have the same purpose: protect with a shield. They are very different units, sure, but the purpose is the same.

What's the difference between those two units anyways?
The protector is just a little bit easier to use with Unit Possession, that's about it.

Protector has a better shield bash, whereas the shield bearer is larger and better defended.

[Bagel Knackstein]

Originally posted by justinharris:

Originally posted by Viper:

You are sort of right, but many units have different abilities and the same purpose. Example: shield bearer and protector both have the same purpose: protect with a shield. They are very different units, sure, but the purpose is the same.

Not exactly,I see your point but the protector is more combat then the sheild bearer.ypu can tell because the sheild is not touching or close to the ground.

But you would not use a protector to attack. It is just a more a n g r y shield bearer, to protect.

[semmiesem9]

Actually, the Protector is definitely a lot more combat-ready than the Shieldbearer. It turns a lot faster, has an angrier swing, and I believe it deals more damage, at the cost of a less stable and less covering shield.

[AscendedViking7]

Originally posted by semmiesem9:

Actually, the Protector is definitely a lot more combat-ready than the Shieldbearer. It turns a lot faster, has an angrier swing, and I believe it deals more damage, at the cost of a less stable and less covering shield.

So the shield-bearer is more useful for keeping a group formation and defending units from being skewered by arrows, while the protector is there for protecting much smaller groups of allies while doing damage on the way?

[Bagel Knackstein]

Originally posted by semmiesem9:

Actually, the Protector is definitely a lot more combat-ready than the Shieldbearer. It turns a lot faster, has an angrier swing, and I believe it deals more damage, at the cost of a less stable and less covering shield.

Yeah, but would you use it to be your main combatant?

[DeEznation]

Originally posted by semmiesem9:

Actually, the Protector is definitely a lot more combat-ready than the Shieldbearer. It turns a lot faster, has an angrier swing, and I believe it deals more damage, at the cost of a less stable and less covering shield.

Ya

[Bagel Knackstein]

Originally posted by justinharris:

Originally posted by semmiesem9:

Actually, the Protector is definitely a lot more combat-ready than the Shieldbearer. It turns a lot faster, has an angrier swing, and I believe it deals more damage, at the cost of a less stable and less covering shield.

Ya

Ya

[DeEznation]

Originally posted by Viper:

Originally posted by semmiesem9:

Actually, the Protector is definitely a lot more combat-ready than the Shieldbearer. It turns a lot faster, has an angrier swing, and I believe it deals more damage, at the cost of a less stable and less covering shield.

Yeah, but would you use it to be your main combatant?

Ranged and swords except the king

[AscendedViking7]

Originally posted by Viper:

Originally posted by justinharris:

Ya

Ya

Ay 👌😎

[Bagel Knackstein]

Originally posted by justinharris:

Originally posted by Viper:

Yeah, but would you use it to be your main combatant?

Ranged and swords except the king

What

[semmiesem9]

Originally posted by Viper:

Originally posted by semmiesem9:

Actually, the Protector is definitely a lot more combat-ready than the Shieldbearer. It turns a lot faster, has an angrier swing, and I believe it deals more damage, at the cost of a less stable and less covering shield.

Yeah, but would you use it to be your main combatant?

Not as a main force, of course, but it is useful against a smaller amount of archers. But I do believe it's already clear that it doesn't have the same exact use as the Shieldbearer. Unless you see it differently because they "both defend against projectiles", but then you might as well say all melee units have the same purpose because they "all attack the enemy at close range".

[Bagel Knackstein]

Originally posted by semmiesem9:

Originally posted by Viper:

Yeah, but would you use it to be your main combatant?

Not as a main force, of course, but it is useful against a smaller amount of archers. But I do believe it's already clear that it doesn't have the same exact use as the Shieldbearer. Unless you see it differently because they "both defend against projectiles", but then you might as well say all melee units have the same purpose because they "all attack the enemy at close range".

True, but they are supposed to be the cheap defense units of the tribal faction.