Five Nights at Freddy's: Sister Location

Five Nights at Freddy's: Sister Location

Random thought: who is red highlighting on TFF in-universe
This is just me being a bit bored, but I think that if TFF was something from the in-game universe, the one making the red highlights has some internal knowledge ("(...)comes to life" and laughing at the Fazbear security), and the remarks together points to a particular character: Michael (or Springtrap if you believe in Miketrap). (It also marks Mike and "part of the attraction", and puts "Spring Bonnie?" with a question mark).

I know, it's silly. It's just a headcanon for now.

EDIT: I mismatched the laughing remark of the "security" with the one of "comes to life". The one on security says "Lies".
Last edited by SenshiOfSadness; Sep 2, 2017 @ 5:01pm
Originally posted by Scott:
There is actually an interesting answer to the question of who, exactly, was marking portions in red and making notes in TFF.

In the beginning, there was an idea that the book should be from the perspective of an in-universe investigator trying to solve the murders from FNaF 1. However, that scope seemed too limited and wouldn't have been able to discuss gameplay strategies, since it was an in-game character.

Then it was changed so that the perspective would be from out-of-universe member of the FNaF community, also investigating, trying to piece together the puzzle. But this would have ultimately been disappointing since the book wasn't designed to solve everything.

So then it was changed to be an in-universe online blogger trying to solve the mystery, but who had an alternate agenda and was trying to mislead readers of the book. However, this was effectively creating an in-universe character and adding to the lore, which I didn't want to do.

So, the identity of the "author" changed many times, and the underlines and red markings are the remnants of those previous characters, two in-universe, and one out. One was on a mission to solve the murders, one was on the trail to the solve the game, and one was on the trail to deliberately mislead you.
< >
Showing 16-24 of 24 comments
The author of this topic has marked a post as the answer to their question.
Scott  [developer] Sep 3, 2017 @ 2:08pm 
There is actually an interesting answer to the question of who, exactly, was marking portions in red and making notes in TFF.

In the beginning, there was an idea that the book should be from the perspective of an in-universe investigator trying to solve the murders from FNaF 1. However, that scope seemed too limited and wouldn't have been able to discuss gameplay strategies, since it was an in-game character.

Then it was changed so that the perspective would be from out-of-universe member of the FNaF community, also investigating, trying to piece together the puzzle. But this would have ultimately been disappointing since the book wasn't designed to solve everything.

So then it was changed to be an in-universe online blogger trying to solve the mystery, but who had an alternate agenda and was trying to mislead readers of the book. However, this was effectively creating an in-universe character and adding to the lore, which I didn't want to do.

So, the identity of the "author" changed many times, and the underlines and red markings are the remnants of those previous characters, two in-universe, and one out. One was on a mission to solve the murders, one was on the trail to the solve the game, and one was on the trail to deliberately mislead you.
Witt Sep 3, 2017 @ 2:10pm 
Originally posted by Scott:
There is actually an interesting answer to the question of who, exactly, was marking portions in red and making notes in TFF.

In the beginning, there was an idea that the book should be from the perspective of an in-universe investigator trying to solve the murders from FNaF 1. However, that scope seemed too limited and wouldn't have been able to discuss gameplay strategies, since it was an in-game character.

Then it was changed so that the perspective would be from out-of-universe member of the FNaF community, also investigating, trying to piece together the puzzle. But this would have ultimately been disappointing since the book wasn't designed to solve everything.

So then it was changed to be an in-universe online blogger trying to solve the mystery, but who had an alternate agenda and was trying to mislead readers of the book. However, this was effectively creating an in-universe character and adding to the lore, which I didn't want to do.

So, the identity of the "author" changed many times, and the underlines and red markings are the remnants of those previous characters, two in-universe, and one out. One was on a mission to solve the murders, one was on the trail to the solve the game, and one was on the trail to deliberately mislead you.
"one was on the trail to deliberately mislead you"
I'm wondering who that is.
Wink wink
Originally posted by Scott:
There is actually an interesting answer to the question of who, exactly, was marking portions in red and making notes in TFF.

In the beginning, there was an idea that the book should be from the perspective of an in-universe investigator trying to solve the murders from FNaF 1. However, that scope seemed too limited and wouldn't have been able to discuss gameplay strategies, since it was an in-game character.

Then it was changed so that the perspective would be from out-of-universe member of the FNaF community, also investigating, trying to piece together the puzzle. But this would have ultimately been disappointing since the book wasn't designed to solve everything.

So then it was changed to be an in-universe online blogger trying to solve the mystery, but who had an alternate agenda and was trying to mislead readers of the book. However, this was effectively creating an in-universe character and adding to the lore, which I didn't want to do.

So, the identity of the "author" changed many times, and the underlines and red markings are the remnants of those previous characters, two in-universe, and one out. One was on a mission to solve the murders, one was on the trail to the solve the game, and one was on the trail to deliberately mislead you. [/qu
Originally posted by Scott:
There is actually an interesting answer to the question of who, exactly, was marking portions in red and making notes in TFF.

In the beginning, there was an idea that the book should be from the perspective of an in-universe investigator trying to solve the murders from FNaF 1. However, that scope seemed too limited and wouldn't have been able to discuss gameplay strategies, since it was an in-game character.

Then it was changed so that the perspective would be from out-of-universe member of the FNaF community, also investigating, trying to piece together the puzzle. But this would have ultimately been disappointing since the book wasn't designed to solve everything.

So then it was changed to be an in-universe online blogger trying to solve the mystery, but who had an alternate agenda and was trying to mislead readers of the book. However, this was effectively creating an in-universe character and adding to the lore, which I didn't want to do.

So, the identity of the "author" changed many times, and the underlines and red markings are the remnants of those previous characters, two in-universe, and one out. One was on a mission to solve the murders, one was on the trail to the solve the game, and one was on the trail to deliberately mislead you.
Can i have my book early please scott in the uk il give you 10 faz tokens for it to come early.
Sp00ky_Matt Sep 3, 2017 @ 2:11pm 
Originally posted by Scott:
There is actually an interesting answer to the question of who, exactly, was marking portions in red and making notes in TFF.

In the beginning, there was an idea that the book should be from the perspective of an in-universe investigator trying to solve the murders from FNaF 1. However, that scope seemed too limited and wouldn't have been able to discuss gameplay strategies, since it was an in-game character.

Then it was changed so that the perspective would be from out-of-universe member of the FNaF community, also investigating, trying to piece together the puzzle. But this would have ultimately been disappointing since the book wasn't designed to solve everything.

So then it was changed to be an in-universe online blogger trying to solve the mystery, but who had an alternate agenda and was trying to mislead readers of the book. However, this was effectively creating an in-universe character and adding to the lore, which I didn't want to do.

So, the identity of the "author" changed many times, and the underlines and red markings are the remnants of those previous characters, two in-universe, and one out. One was on a mission to solve the murders, one was on the trail to the solve the game, and one was on the trail to deliberately mislead you.
Just as confusing as the lore👌 your a natural, palsy
Superstu Sep 3, 2017 @ 2:14pm 
Originally posted by Scott:
There is actually an interesting answer to the question of who, exactly, was marking portions in red and making notes in TFF.

In the beginning, there was an idea that the book should be from the perspective of an in-universe investigator trying to solve the murders from FNaF 1. However, that scope seemed too limited and wouldn't have been able to discuss gameplay strategies, since it was an in-game character.

Then it was changed so that the perspective would be from out-of-universe member of the FNaF community, also investigating, trying to piece together the puzzle. But this would have ultimately been disappointing since the book wasn't designed to solve everything.

So then it was changed to be an in-universe online blogger trying to solve the mystery, but who had an alternate agenda and was trying to mislead readers of the book. However, this was effectively creating an in-universe character and adding to the lore, which I didn't want to do.

So, the identity of the "author" changed many times, and the underlines and red markings are the remnants of those previous characters, two in-universe, and one out. One was on a mission to solve the murders, one was on the trail to the solve the game, and one was on the trail to deliberately mislead you.
on the topic of TTF, would you say anything in the book was actually made to confirm / make theories more likely, or does it not really change much in that regard?
Originally posted by Scott:
There is actually an interesting answer to the question of who, exactly, was marking portions in red and making notes in TFF.

In the beginning, there was an idea that the book should be from the perspective of an in-universe investigator trying to solve the murders from FNaF 1. However, that scope seemed too limited and wouldn't have been able to discuss gameplay strategies, since it was an in-game character.

Then it was changed so that the perspective would be from out-of-universe member of the FNaF community, also investigating, trying to piece together the puzzle. But this would have ultimately been disappointing since the book wasn't designed to solve everything.

So then it was changed to be an in-universe online blogger trying to solve the mystery, but who had an alternate agenda and was trying to mislead readers of the book. However, this was effectively creating an in-universe character and adding to the lore, which I didn't want to do.

So, the identity of the "author" changed many times, and the underlines and red markings are the remnants of those previous characters, two in-universe, and one out. One was on a mission to solve the murders, one was on the trail to the solve the game, and one was on the trail to deliberately mislead you.
Mind. Blown.
Tiger-Bear991 Sep 3, 2017 @ 3:10pm 
Originally posted by Scott:
There is actually an interesting answer to the question of who, exactly, was marking portions in red and making notes in TFF.

In the beginning, there was an idea that the book should be from the perspective of an in-universe investigator trying to solve the murders from FNaF 1. However, that scope seemed too limited and wouldn't have been able to discuss gameplay strategies, since it was an in-game character.

Then it was changed so that the perspective would be from out-of-universe member of the FNaF community, also investigating, trying to piece together the puzzle. But this would have ultimately been disappointing since the book wasn't designed to solve everything.

So then it was changed to be an in-universe online blogger trying to solve the mystery, but who had an alternate agenda and was trying to mislead readers of the book. However, this was effectively creating an in-universe character and adding to the lore, which I didn't want to do.

So, the identity of the "author" changed many times, and the underlines and red markings are the remnants of those previous characters, two in-universe, and one out. One was on a mission to solve the murders, one was on the trail to the solve the game, and one was on the trail to deliberately mislead you.
Interesting...
jackalackin Sep 3, 2017 @ 3:57pm 
Originally posted by Scott:
There is actually an interesting answer to the question of who, exactly, was marking portions in red and making notes in TFF.

In the beginning, there was an idea that the book should be from the perspective of an in-universe investigator trying to solve the murders from FNaF 1. However, that scope seemed too limited and wouldn't have been able to discuss gameplay strategies, since it was an in-game character.

Then it was changed so that the perspective would be from out-of-universe member of the FNaF community, also investigating, trying to piece together the puzzle. But this would have ultimately been disappointing since the book wasn't designed to solve everything.

So then it was changed to be an in-universe online blogger trying to solve the mystery, but who had an alternate agenda and was trying to mislead readers of the book. However, this was effectively creating an in-universe character and adding to the lore, which I didn't want to do.

So, the identity of the "author" changed many times, and the underlines and red markings are the remnants of those previous characters, two in-universe, and one out. One was on a mission to solve the murders, one was on the trail to the solve the game, and one was on the trail to deliberately mislead you.
Honestly a cannon detective story would be very interesting.
Rollerwings Sep 3, 2017 @ 7:55pm 
Thanks for the information on the "author." I'd only seen the free-preview pages (and thus had a limited view of what was written/drawn/circled, etc.) and somehow had the idea the mysterious wielder of the red pen was Mike Schmidt. He had to have been a little sore over getting fired so insultingly just a day after being named employee of the month, and if he survived the week he would have his own reasons for poking fun at some of the shadier things Phone Guy said.
< >
Showing 16-24 of 24 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Sep 2, 2017 @ 4:35pm
Posts: 24