安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
As such, combat-driven players would then be educated to know that they don't need to stock up on more than three magazines for the majority of their weapons. To take more than what's needed makes the loss greater for if you die, and it's completely viable to scav off of dead bodies to make ends meet on the frontline.
Mate, go back to Dungeons and Dragons you control freak.
All anyone wants is for people to stop ruining their efforts.
Stop stealing trucks with supplies meant for somewhere else and getting them blown up.
Stop throwing away all that ammo and the costs of respawns.
You can totally go off on your own without taking anything, the battlefield provides more than you'll ever need. Loot guns off corpses and go be rambo (cannon fodder is always welcome), just don't waste someone else's efforts. That's a ♥♥♥♥ move.
It's equivalent to killing your teammates in CoD or some similar garbage because they are "in your spot" or have more kills than you.