BAMCO is so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ greedy, wow dude.

MMU TF-23 DLC

Just to much Money! For 10 Bucks i would say maybe, for 5 it where a nobrainer for me as a big Top Gun Fan.
But for 20? I Say take the Money to your local Cinema, get a Top Gun: Maverick Ticket, Popcorn and a Drink and watch one of the best Movies of the last Years.

引用自 Mortal_Kasi：

Just to much Money! For 10 Bucks i would say maybe, for 5 it where a nobrainer for me as a big Top Gun Fan.
But for 20? I Say take the Money to your local Cinema, get a Top Gun: Maverick Ticket, Popcorn and a Drink and watch one of the best Movies of the last Years.

To be fair, you need to account for the cost of:

- getting the license for the planes (even applies to the fictional DarkStar since Lockheed Martin designed it);
- getting approval for depicting the skins and emblem featured (from Paramount and U.S. Department of Defense);
- and getting approval to use Danger Zone and Top Gun Anthem.

All in all, prior DLC sets cost $12 (planes, skins, and emblem). Compare that to DLC planes in DCS and War Thunder.

All I want is a option to change my Field of View in first person. :c

Bring VR to pc come on man this game has been out for so long and the best place for vr is right here on steam.

引用自 Gonzo850：

Missions pack dlc and 'Mission Creator/Editor' please :cybereye:

Lol they aren't making money anymore if that's given to us.

引用自 paomayo：

引用自 Mortal_Kasi：

Just to much Money! For 10 Bucks i would say maybe, for 5 it where a nobrainer for me as a big Top Gun Fan.
But for 20? I Say take the Money to your local Cinema, get a Top Gun: Maverick Ticket, Popcorn and a Drink and watch one of the best Movies of the last Years.

To be fair, you need to account for the cost of:

- getting the license for the planes (even applies to the fictional DarkStar since Lockheed Martin designed it);
- getting approval for depicting the skins and emblem featured (from Paramount and U.S. Department of Defense);
- and getting approval to use Danger Zone and Top Gun Anthem.

All in all, prior DLC sets cost $12 (planes, skins, and emblem). Compare that to DLC planes in DCS and War Thunder.

This is very fair.

引用自 Javk5pakfa：

引用自 paomayo：

To be fair, you need to account for the cost of:

- getting the license for the planes (even applies to the fictional DarkStar since Lockheed Martin designed it);
- getting approval for depicting the skins and emblem featured (from Paramount and U.S. Department of Defense);
- and getting approval to use Danger Zone and Top Gun Anthem.

All in all, prior DLC sets cost $12 (planes, skins, and emblem). Compare that to DLC planes in DCS and War Thunder.

This is very fair.

War Thunder is free to play (pay to win) and a bit more realistic and fleshed out cockpit wise.
Wouldn't be so adverse to the price they're asking if they at least built a mini campaign to accompany this.

引用自 BioRadical：

引用自 Javk5pakfa：

This is very fair.

War Thunder is free to play (pay to win) and a bit more realistic and fleshed out cockpit wise.
Wouldn't be so adverse to the price they're asking if they at least built a mini campaign to accompany this.

yeah they should have made 100 ONE MILLION additional missions for free over those stupid movie tieup planes

I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THEY KEEP BETTING ON THE SAME THING, RELEASE DLC WITH MORE AND MORE PLANES AND NOT NEW MISSIONS AND REAL CONTENT!!!

I am someone who met them playing "Ace combat zero the belkan war" and who loves their games but it annoys me that they release DLC with plans and more plans and do not bring new content. Really why the ♥♥♥♥ do they focus on multiplayer only?? It sucks to have many plans that you can't enjoy anywhere else except in the emotionless campaign full of restrictions or in the 3 stupid missions that they put as bonuses.

I WANT TO KNOW IF THE DLC ADD MISSIONS LIKE THIS AT LEAST I WILL KNOW WITH PLEASURE THAT I'M WRONG BECAUSE IF NOT, YOU ARE LETTING THIS GAME DIE...

PROJECT WIGMAN IS BETTER THAN THIS GAME AND IT IS AN INDIE GAME!!!!

WHY THE ♥♥♥♥ DO THEY DO THIS? IT'S LIKE HAVING MULTIPLE WEAPONS AND HAVING NO PLACE TO USE THEM. OR A VARIETY OF SHOOTING RANGE TO TRY THEM IN DIFFERENT WAYS!!!!

NO ENTIENDO POR QUE SIGUEN APUESTANDO A LO MISMO, SACAR DLC CON MAS Y MAS PLANOS Y NO NUEVAS MISIONES Y CONTENIDO REAL!!!

Soy alguien que los conocí jugando "Ace combat zero the belkan war" y que amo sus juegos pero me molesta que saquen DLC con planes y más planes y no traen contenido nuevo. Realmente, ¿por qué diablos se enfocan solo en el modo multijugador? Apesta tener muchos planes que no puedes disfrutar en ningún otro lugar excepto en la campaña sin emociones llena de restricciones o en las 3 misiones estúpidas que ponen como bonos.

QUIERO SABER SI EL DLC AGREGA MISIONES COMO ESTA POR LO MENOS SABRÉ CON GUSTO QUE ESTOY EQUIVOCADO PORQUE SI NO ESTÁS DEJANDO MORIR ESTE JUEGO...

¡EL PROYECTO WIGMAN ES MEJOR QUE ESTE JUEGO Y ES UN JUEGO INDIE!

¿POR QUÉ MIERDA HACEN ESTO? ES COMO TENER MÚLTIPLES ARMAS Y NO TENER LUGAR DONDE UTILIZARLAS. O UNA VARIEDAD DE CAMPOS DE TIRO PARA PROBARLOS DE DIFERENTES MANERAS!!!!

If the developer or someone reads this to me, it is important! damn bastards!!!

I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THEY KEEP BETTING ON THE SAME THING, RELEASE DLC WITH MORE AND MORE PLANES AND NOT NEW MISSIONS AND REAL CONTENT!!!

I am someone who met them playing "Ace combat zero the belkan war" and who loves their games but it annoys me that they release DLC with plans and more plans and do not bring new content. Really why the ♥♥♥♥ do they focus on multiplayer only?? It sucks to have many plans that you can't enjoy anywhere else except in the emotionless campaign full of restrictions or in the 3 stupid missions that they put as bonuses.

I WANT TO KNOW IF THE DLC ADD MISSIONS LIKE THIS AT LEAST I WILL KNOW WITH PLEASURE THAT I'M WRONG BECAUSE IF NOT, YOU ARE LETTING THIS GAME DIE...

PROJECT WIGMAN IS BETTER THAN THIS GAME AND IT IS AN INDIE GAME!!!!

WHY THE ♥♥♥♥ DO THEY DO THIS? IT'S LIKE HAVING MULTIPLE WEAPONS AND HAVING NO PLACE TO USE THEM. OR A VARIETY OF SHOOTING RANGE TO TRY THEM IN DIFFERENT WAYS!!!!

引用自 PIXEL-DOG：

If the developer or someone reads this to me, it is important! damn bastards!!!

I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THEY KEEP BETTING ON THE SAME THING, RELEASE DLC WITH MORE AND MORE PLANES AND NOT NEW MISSIONS AND REAL CONTENT!!!

I am someone who met them playing "Ace combat zero the belkan war" and who loves their games but it annoys me that they release DLC with plans and more plans and do not bring new content. Really why the ♥♥♥♥ do they focus on multiplayer only?? It sucks to have many plans that you can't enjoy anywhere else except in the emotionless campaign full of restrictions or in the 3 stupid missions that they put as bonuses.

I WANT TO KNOW IF THE DLC ADD MISSIONS LIKE THIS AT LEAST I WILL KNOW WITH PLEASURE THAT I'M WRONG BECAUSE IF NOT, YOU ARE LETTING THIS GAME DIE...

PROJECT WIGMAN IS BETTER THAN THIS GAME AND IT IS AN INDIE GAME!!!!

WHY THE ♥♥♥♥ DO THEY DO THIS? IT'S LIKE HAVING MULTIPLE WEAPONS AND HAVING NO PLACE TO USE THEM. OR A VARIETY OF SHOOTING RANGE TO TRY THEM IN DIFFERENT WAYS!!!!

They're not exactly betting on multiplayer here. Besides, you can listen to the music on YouTube.

This is obviously dirt cheap to produce and still gets good money, but man I really hope that money is going towards making more real content.