Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The entire IRL debate came down to lockheed-martin shoving more money in via 'lobbying' and 'donations' to buy an edge.
The YF-23, much like the F-20, got screwed because somebody else murdered it before it got a chance.
With the YF-23 it was shady money, with the F-20 it was the sudden decision to make official military aircraft exportable, resulting in foreign nations taking the F-16 over the F-20 which was equal or better in basically every way at the time. That and the air force actively trying to sack it in favor of their choice of f-16.
I also love that the crashes of the F-20 basically came down to 'turned so good our pilot couldn't handle it and G-LOCed'.
Can you tell I like Northrop-Grumman better than I do Lockheed-Martin? I also like Mcdonnel-Douglas more than Lockheed-Martin.
But if i had to choose i would take the F-22 simply because of the Weapon Pods shown in the Trailer.
SU-47 Berkut > Everything including the ADF-01 FALKEN
Doesn't really matter, Suhoi series is dominating that categpry
Now that's a classic. Come to think of it, i've never played a WW1 fighter game. That old Secret Weapons Over Normandy was pretty fun though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOb9-H5eF_U&list=PL212235825F1BFB0D&index=5
MiG 31