Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Ah yes, i think what you have problem with is the "casus bellum" for the stories. I agree that usually the ways wars are started in this game series are very.... unique. The reasons are indeed strange and the way the Belkans operate is as if they are some shadow government that controls many of the major countries' key facilities/agencies.
Basically, the Belkan's don't have a country anymore but they are the source of all problems and always try to pit other countries into a war with each other because... revenge? Hatred towards anyone non-Belkan? The "others"?
I mean the scientist in AC7 (schroeder? can't exactly remember his name) appears to have been made to represent the Belkan motivation and why they want to start wars but the means by which they accomplish things are a bit ridiculous. How can the Belkans have so much influence everywhere and why are they ALL on the same page? I don't think I've seen Belkans fight each other but other nations always seem to have traitors in their midst. Whether they are Belkan in origin or just bribed to help them.
I think they need to work on the "casus bellum" for these stories. Maybe the next game should have a similar "4+5/20-9" type event *winkwink* to justify the next war.
-Fullband was a halfass way to kill off someone. Champs death made more sense, or high roller. We didn't exactly get a clue as to what he "discovered
- aside from I'll tell you later.
-what behind the friendly awacs that branded the conservative genraal as target #1.
With zero and 5 you felt certain about the plot and why was going on. Hell, even Harling's death didn't feel real to me. I kept expecting him to show up somewhere not a dead.
On a positive note you got a juicy bit of foretelling based on how you killed the drones.
- with machine gun you didn't fire a missle so your reaction would be wtf I didn't do it"
-flipside your first reaction be oops. I Tought Iwas firing at a drone.
By then Spare was already set to be transferred into Wiseman's posse. Since that meant a top secret elite air group with a last ditch effort to strike the enemy's capital...
That said, regardless of 'what' he found, he is a convict who admitted to bribery/hacking into stuff he really shouldn't. In doing so over open air like that, he implicates every member of spare squadron who heard him admit it into being an accessory to the crime, including Bandog. Bandog actually gives him MULTIPLE warnings to shut his mouth about his 'intel' during the mission, and does seem to sigh aweful hard after the second or third warning. He does seem to have given him quite the chance to still live.
Bandog may even have taken that measure to avoid Full-band's stupid from harming Count and especially Trigger's chances of getting out of spare squadron. As well as protect the rest of spare squadron (whoever's left at that point, some unnamed spares and Tabloid, iirc) from being caught up in Full-band's punishments.
The following mission, Bandog's dialogue implies that the Commander did not authorize the actions and that the lot of them could get in trouble for it. Could also read regret into it, given how harshly he shuts Count up. He also openly rebukes Count about Trigger being the worst convict there, and proceeds to make mention that for a fraudster, Count is bad at sniffing it out.
If you happen to follow full-band's craft you will see that it is count who shoots him down in-game, and that his IFF is still indicating friendly to presumably everyone but Count, which does very much implicate Bandog.
And the final mission is a bomb. Reminding me my Jack Bartlett and the legendary Razgriz Squadron.
1.) The whole "don't worry about dying and smearing of sins" was partially an act. Remember he is a prison guard somewhat. So he has to be tough brutal to try and get criminals to do his bidding.
2.) He freaks out over the whole drone F/A-18F friendly fire incident, if he truly didn't give a damn... he wouldn't have reacted that way.
3.) He really doesnt like the commander. If you let him get shot down Bandog will say he wasn't a load worth saving.
I like longcasters fascination with food though. I picture a chubby black guy trying eat and keep an eye out everyone.
Bandog is Complicit in the war. Remember, there is a conspiracy on both the Osean and Erusean side. Remember, much of the 444 Squadron has no warm feelings about Osea.