Whats next UL?A Che guevera T shirt??

[Redarmy]

I have uninstalled your game and i will not be pursuing interest in SOD3.

You lost a customer and im feel im not alone in saying this.

KEEP POLITICS AND PANDERING OUT OF GAMING!

[Bismillah]

lol

[Fenris]

hey che guevera was a good guy

[LArc7thHeaven]

I prefer St tarrant one lololol

[JazzGuru]

Then the Americans would cry REALLY hard, seeing as very few of them are seemingly able to understand socialism...

[Mavkiel]

Because nobody could object to a group lead by "trained marxists" that burn down american cities and murder people. But hey, I guess they needed more nike shoes and tvs. Who cares if little black girls get murdered in the back of their mothers car. Or a retired cop gets murdered by a looter over a tv.

[Dexterfy]

Spotted the right wing incel. Bye Felisha, you won't be missed :D

[Albatross]

Guevera was based as ♥♥♥♥. Can we get some soviet outfits too? Triggering conservatards is hilarious.

[Albatross]

Also redarmy in your name but not a leftist? Cringe af bro.

[Fenris]

Albatross の投稿を引用：

Guevera was based as ♥♥♥♥. Can we get some soviet outfits too? Triggering conservatards is hilarious.

You're being satirical right lol

[Fenris]

Albatross の投稿を引用：

Guevera was based as ♥♥♥♥. Can we get some soviet outfits too? Triggering conservatards is hilarious.

Che Guevara was something an educated liberal would hate. He was a communist revolutionary who, like all communists, put the needs of society before the needs of the individual. That meant that he could justify his bad actions as being good because it was good for society as a whole, just like stalin mao and hitler did. That meant Che executed anyone who was a dissident. He was a straight murderer. In addition to killing anyone who disagreed with his revolution, he sent people to concentration camps. Those same people included homosexuals since gays in that time were disliked by society (in addition to being unable to do their mandatory military service). The dude was straight evil. He even advocated for nuclear war against america.

Liberals have rose tinted glasses when they look at che in any positive light. His political principals, while perhaps inspiring for a young communist, were completely overshadowed by the brutal treatment of anybody who disagreed with him. He was a power hungry tyrant whose legacy is that of revolutionary bloodshed. That's it.

[Albatross]

Educated liberals are the problem. Guevera is beloved because he led nationalist revolts against american imperialism. Sadly america is too cucked to do the same to the bankers and shareholders that run our society. All politics is violence, communists are just honest about it.

[Fenris]

Albatross の投稿を引用：

Educated liberals are the problem. Guevera is beloved because he led nationalist revolts against american imperialism. Sadly america is too cucked to do the same to the bankers and shareholders that run our society. All politics is violence, communists are just honest about it.

No you can't compare communists to anybody but the extreme, i.e. fascists. The communist state requires complete control over the economy to "eliminate classes", and every example of communism we have seen has had its leaders use equality as an excuse to oppress and massacre their own people. There is no positive outlook you can use to paint Communism in anything less than a dystopian nightmare. the only plausible way you can use to talk about communism is in that cliche bs "no communist country has ever existed"

[Albatross]

Liberal brainrot above. I forget how little your average westerner knows about anything, let alone about communism.

[starchaser]

LOL, communism won WW2, while useless americans and brits sitted behind the sea, landing only after Stalingrad, after Prohorovka, after destruction of majority of germanian forces - like they waited which side they supposed to support, more ideologically close Germany or their supposedly-allied USSR.

It transformed nearly-medieval societies with over 90% of population living in subsistence into industrial giants with large urban centers within decades after winning civil wars in respectable countries (like the USSR and China).

It created the most equal society, instead of modern western model where 1% of population own around 50% GDP, rich grow only richer while common people can't afford to have children. And it catered needs of majority, not vocal minorities - sometimes very repulsive, like the LGBT crowd. Yes, supporting whims of splinter factions just because their vote easier to sway, is madness to the society.

Democracy killed far more people than any communist repressions - even if look after WW2. From Vietnam and Korea to the Iraq and Syria.

That's why after fall of the USSR was so much disappointment with pro-western democracy in Russia, how much living standards had declined after USSR era (despite promises of Clinton best friend, Eltsin) - and now solid majority think it was a tragedy.

[Boboscus]

Your nickname disagrees.