Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Having guerrillas is a choice. It's your own fault for having low liberty. If you're going to play with guerrillas then don't make your entire economy dependent on tourism.
The point is that I don't have a bad government and I have very few guerrillas, as I said before, I literally have 4 crazy people who attack from the most inhospitable areas of the island, and who are quickly intercepted by my planes, that's why I say I don't understand Why does that have to affect my tourism?
It doesn't matter how safe you proclaim a place to be. If folks come out of the jungle with guns to raid your settlements for whatever reason (even if they limit it to targeting only certain state/military areas), most tourists WILL distrust the place and it will hit the industry. That's how it generally goes IRL everywhere.
Whining this hard about "X game good Y game bad" over this is kinda hilarious.
That tourism is affected is not the same as that all tourists leave en masse and that for the next 5 years a maximum of 10 tourists come per boat, that is what I mean, my tourism industry was not affected, it was directly ruined, Mexico's industry is affected, yes, but Acapulco hotels do not go bankrupt
Anyway, after analyzing the problem, I realized that it wasn't the crazy 4 in the jungle, but apparently the rebels stealthily set fires to me in the tourist areas... could it be that? obviously I should have placed more watchtowers
I don't know, I think Tropico 5 was done much better than this.
As i said before, even fighting in tropico 6 is really embarrassing... Once, the rebels came to attack me and my tanks first went to the place where the rebels spawned and then turned around chasing them to the city...
There is logic to "tourists don't want to visit warzones", but I have tourists on one island and the rebels attacking on another; and was left confused as to where all my tourists went. There isn't any message or ultimatum, it just quietly happens in the background. And my liberty wasn't bad, I had newspapers, tv stations, and radio. Everyone was well paid and had the best possible living quarters they could afford. The only problem is it seemed like some political factions were angry at me. It is less of "a choice" and more of "okay, so rebels exist for whatever reason and that means I just can't do tourism?"
If Tropico 7 ever happens, this needs to be something to fix. Not remove, just fix. I find rebels not much of a threat to my military as well, so it just becomes an annoyance more than any sort of "choice" or challenge. Tourism doesn't pay very well either and is expensive to get going properly. It feels like both of these two elements could use some serious work, both in general as well as how they interact with one another.
and I insist that the combats are little more than embarrassing in this game, even tropical 4 had better combats.
I am consistently amazed that people on Steam are unable to grasp the concept that because there is an element to a game that they personally don't prefer that it doesn't make the game wrong or worse or buggy or whatever. I have been playing Tropico since the beginning of the series and enjoyed each one on its own merits. Also, I've never suffered the issues with rebels destroying my tourist industry that you describe. There's a way to deal with it. You just haven't figured it out.