Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
(Individual buildings do show the value of their produced items under the statistic tab, but that's not a 1-to-1 comparison to what has gone into your treasury, since some of that has been exported, some hasn't and is sitting at the building it was produced at, and some may be consumed domestically.)
Though more to your point, if you want a report of overall revenue and expenses, check the almanac - that has a much clearer breakdown of what goes into and out of your treasury.
Income (lifetime) $-181,352
Income (last month) $-278
Production value (lifetime) $948,154
Production value (last month) $1,951
I don't know what the devs are thinking about those negative numbers :)
Maybe they were going for accounting 101. When I first started my career 35+ years ago it took me a while to wrap my head around how -100 could possibly be a credit.
Don't know, looking for an explanation too as it confuses me in T6
With that said....
It sure appears that the income figures represent the operating costs. So you’ve spent 181,352 over the buildings lifetime to operate it. Meanwhile it has produced 948,154 worth of exportable goods during that same time period.
Assuming goods aren’t instantly sold and instead need to actually be exported, it makes sense to report it this way, as the building itself is not producing income unless the goods are exported.
However, assuming all the goods exported for the price listed, you have an actual profit of around 3/4 million from the textile mill.
The "Income (Lifetime)" is really just "Upkeep/Budget (Lifetime)" - so in Battleclown's case, his Textile Mill has produced a net value of $766,802 worth of cloth over its lifetime, and in the past month has produced a net value of $1,673.
This building does not produce an income because no one pays money directly into the building
Taverns, hotels, etc places that actually have people pay them directly would have an income. This being a textile mill it's spending money on workers. That income lifetime is total budget and direct pay income, since the building makes no direct money it shows negative
On the other hand you've produced $948,154 worth of trade goods in production value.
Why is that not immediately counted as income? Because it's not income until it's moved to the docks and actually sold. Many things can effect this:
Teamsters can lose product on the way to the docks (depending on work mode), total cost of sales can go up or down depending on current export trade routes (with positive or negative effects)
It's really pretty obvious if you think about it
Production value isn't profit, it's potential profit and that potential can be lost or manipulated depending on how it's moved to the docks and what trade routes you take
Only buildings that are paid in directly will have positive income listed, production buildings have a production value, but you need to safely get that to a dock and export it for a profit
That said, the aforementioned Statistics tab (aside from the odd naming of the stats) makes it pretty clear whether it's making a (potential) profit or not - if the bottom numbers of production value are higher than the top numbers of "Income" - or rather, upkeep/budget/expenses - it's profitable (assuming you're exporting the value of those goods in the case of a production building). :)
Last but not least, yeah, a simple fix for the devs would be renaming that "Income" to "Upkeep" or "Expenses" or whatnot, since that's what it is.
Or it would have to be spread to 6 lines which would be even more confusing.
If anything it should be replaced with word: balance (of building)
(And, more to the point, I'm not sure what the intense interest in building expenses is when - so long as the building is not idle for long periods of time - they tend to make plenty of money. From what I've seen, normal operation for factories, for example, produces about 5-10 times as much value as its upkeep - making upkeep more-or-less negligible.)
The far easier answer to anyone looking for detail on overall Treasury profit and loss is to go to the Alamanac, which gives a much clearer picture of what's going on and breaks everything down pretty darn well - especially if you click on subcategories to expand them for more detail. :)