Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yeah. It never occured to me before, honestly. I mean, i had read the description of Skyfire trait, but until i actually sat down and counted the units that are skimmer/jetbike/jetpack one by one, i hadn't realized how many there were.
In the base game, only Necrons were really susceptible to this. But later T'au, Eldar, and Drukhari were added too. So now there are several units that fall into that category.
And the question is, why do people make Predators? But to have anti-tank anti-fortification of course. The Hunter's weapon is range 3 too and is slightly better than the lascannon technically, but gets a severe penalty vs normal ground targets. But when a faction literally has all its vehicles being skimmers, why build Predators and not Hunters? Predators do slightly less damage to skimmers, and they don't hit flying units well. They cost the same, they are similar otherwise.
Amazing, really.
Yes, but the comparison is with the Predator tank. And if you compared their main weapon stats, Hunter is better, and even its adjacency bonus is better than Predator's. Hunter is supposed to be balanced around being poor vs ground units except skimmers. But many factions have only skimmers or mostly skimmers, and against those, Hunters are a better main battle tank than Predator at T4, not just an anti-air unit.