Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
People would 100% pay for that dlc. Hell I would argue Votann would also be a good bet since they are new.
Speak for yourself. Drukhari literally do nothing in the lore, they exist for "grimdark".
At least the custodes did stuff before the HH and in the current setting and as a faction they are a lot more complex and imo fun.
A better more interesting adition would be the eldars worshiping Cegorach but I dont know how they would add them.
I am not saying Drukhari shouldnt be added. Hell they can add them next, but I think they could make a lot of money from factions like Custodes,Votann or maybe the Inquisition with Grey Knights.
I don't think that having Custodes in this game would make any sense at all, but I would find it nonsensical to call them a 'cashgrab'.
It's just that I don't think that they would fit into the scope and background of the game. In what way are they a 'faction' anyway? As far as I know, they are basically a single unit - assisted by another single unit (Sisters of Silence) and whatever else you wish to thow in the mix from the Imperium. A super unit by itself is not a faction.
You'd have to come up with sensible mechanics, economy, unit roster, tech tree and background for them - and I think you'd have to struggle with each of these. It would make far more sense to throw them in with the Inquisition or the Space Marines, or possibly as a character in quests / scenarios.
How is the optional addition of a niche, secondary, not-especially-popular-faction a "cash grab"?
If not then the Votann are still a much more sensible option because they are new and people would just buy it.
happens to much there and it dont does the factions any good when you look at the newer Editions. Eldar hacked in 3, Tyranids hacked in 2, aso....
so, try to prove me wrong that all this "new" subfactioning and new minirooster armys are not for cashgrabs sake in TT Grotzel....
That's a really superficial take. They do heaps in the lore - I'm not sure you know what the word 'literally' means. Saying they only exist for grimdark is like saying Necrons, Tyranids or Chaos only exist for grimdark.
Besides, a big 'no' to Custodes. They have too few units and they are, frankly, boring as hell.
Also, your main argument for Custodes works for the Genestealer Cults too. No other 40K game has them as a playable option.
But even if not my beloved Cults I'd prefer the Dark Eldar to Custodes. Then Votann before Custodes as well. Maybe even Harlequins before Custodes.
... Definitely Kroot before Custodes, but such is only the distant dreams of a madman.