Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No you can only get some more troops and get them to cavalry
Infantry= Great for castle sieges/defense
Cavalry= Great for obliterating anything on battlefields with no thinking needed just charge. If your feeling really strategic split them in half and make them come at both sides of enemy.
Typically cavalry are better, but good infantry are very handy to have as well.
Good to have a mix of troops.
Of course some factions like the Rhodoks don't have any cavalry and virtually all Khergit troops are mounted. Other factions like the Sarranids don't have particuarly good elite infantry. Arguably the worst in the game, but someone has to be there afterall.
trust me on it, Calvary is far supperior.
So Mount it is...
-----
Best cavalry for keeping other cavalry occupied are vKHAs. Stopped cavalry = sitting soon dead duck.
-----
Cavalry charging up a slope can sometimes slow down too much to use couched lances.
-----
Good infantry WITH good shields (i.e. no Huscarls) in formation will beat a like number of Cavalry. Even the Mamluke (yes, even the ones using Blunts) types. If you can't, you're not doing it right.
Take a like number of Swadian knights and charge them versus Sea Raiders (bandits, so they likewise charge too), you'll need to be near Wuss or on Wuss difficulty to win 'economically'.
-----
The main reason for getting the more expensive, the less effective than infantry in formation, the far less flexible cavalry. They make you go vroom vroom on the big map. You CAN have 'infantry' (mamlukes), 'fast cavalry' (lancers or heavier Swadians) and even 'archers' (KHAs) to create a 100% mounted warband.
I disagree entirely. Cavalry is for flanking. Infantry can vary from pike men, to legionnaire types (ie huscarls), to skirmirshers. For instance the last battle I fought was 40 huscarls backed by 20 swadian knights, supported by veegir archers facing around 250 heavy swadian forces, knights, men at arms, and crossbowmen mainly. They charge at the shieldwall, go out and disrupt them with your cavalry, get them to chase you and when theyre in a bad spot have your infantry charge. Using this tactic you can sustain 1-5 deaths and squash foes 2-3 times your size. I lost 6 knights and a huscarl. Slaughtered around 200 enemies....Use your cavalries mobility to outmaneuver your enemy. Generally real medieval strategy is going to work in this game.