Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also it seems to me that civ has more politics and mount and blade has more blood.
Firxax, like many dev houses, needs to make some new IP.
Same story for TaleWorlds, if you're going to run M&B by us once again, you better put a lot of new capabilities and content in the game, not just pretty up the graphics.
My vote here: Warband. Because you can play it the way you see fit. Civ, while pretending to offer you choices, in reality has optimal build decisions all along the way, play enough and you'll see them and know them for what they are.
its deff is a tough question. i stood more towards M&B while he was to Civ, he almost looks down at M&B.