Mount & Blade: Warband

Mount & Blade: Warband

View Stats:
viking conquest - kids?
when talking to your spouse you can say, how are my offspring, can we have kids?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 45 comments
Chikuwu Sep 8, 2015 @ 4:28am 
yes you can get your wife pregnant, and you then raise him.
if wife then how do i bang my husband?
Chikuwu Sep 8, 2015 @ 4:57am 
Originally posted by Touka:
if wife then how do i bang my husband?

Im pretty sure you cant get pregnant yourself if you play a female.

there havent been anything in the wiki, other than ladies being able to carry offspring.

would break the game to be pregnant.
Originally posted by Chiku:
Originally posted by Touka:
if wife then how do i bang my husband?

Im pretty sure you cant get pregnant yourself if you play a female.

there havent been anything in the wiki, other than ladies being able to carry offspring.

would break the game to be pregnant.
true story
id hate to say it, but thats sexist, a man can have a baby buy a woman can't haha
Captain Man May 8, 2016 @ 8:59pm 
Originally posted by Hinami:
id hate to say it, but thats sexist, a man can have a baby buy a woman can't haha
Explain me this how the ♥♥♥♥ is a pregnant woman supposed to fight people there is much agility there and with the fear of hurting the baby it would render them useless on the battlefield so unless you can go into another charecter or something like that it wouldnt make sense for that to happen
Tanya Degurechaff May 8, 2016 @ 10:46pm 
Originally posted by Buffalo Soldier:
Originally posted by Hinami:
id hate to say it, but thats sexist, a man can have a baby buy a woman can't haha
Explain me this how the ♥♥♥♥ is a pregnant woman supposed to fight people there is much agility there and with the fear of hurting the baby it would render them useless on the battlefield so unless you can go into another charecter or something like that it wouldnt make sense for that to happen
explain to me why a woman can't be a tactician?
Technopiper May 8, 2016 @ 10:49pm 
Originally posted by Hinami:
Originally posted by Buffalo Soldier:
Explain me this how the ♥♥♥♥ is a pregnant woman supposed to fight people there is much agility there and with the fear of hurting the baby it would render them useless on the battlefield so unless you can go into another charecter or something like that it wouldnt make sense for that to happen
explain to me why a woman can't be a tactician?
He didn't say that. You did.
Tanya Degurechaff May 8, 2016 @ 10:55pm 
Originally posted by Technopiper:
Originally posted by Hinami:
explain to me why a woman can't be a tactician?
He didn't say that. You did.
when?
A woman would be in no mindset or condition to be on the battlefield during pregnancy. She would also be unable to travel after birth because of the child needing parenting and an education, along with the chance of the supply train getting attacked makes having young children while fighting a war very risky. And you expect some young lord to parent while you are away fighting? He has to answer the marshalls call too, and attack bandits, and defend seiges. Not much of a childhood.

So no, its not sexist, its realism.
Stfu about the politically correct BS.
Chikuwu May 9, 2016 @ 2:41am 
Originally posted by Axel MY CABBAGES!:
A woman would be in no mindset or condition to be on the battlefield during pregnancy. She would also be unable to travel after birth because of the child needing parenting and an education, along with the chance of the supply train getting attacked makes having young children while fighting a war very risky. And you expect some young lord to parent while you are away fighting? He has to answer the marshalls call too, and attack bandits, and defend seiges. Not much of a childhood.

So no, its not sexist, its realism.
Stfu about the politically correct BS.

Its not that a pregnant woman cant fight, its that in her physical condition she would be a target. easily captured and turning tides.

usually the supply train that had some whences in them back in viking ages, the women when pregnant were left in other villages.
Originally posted by Chiku kickback.com:
Originally posted by Axel MY CABBAGES!:
A woman would be in no mindset or condition to be on the battlefield during pregnancy. She would also be unable to travel after birth because of the child needing parenting and an education, along with the chance of the supply train getting attacked makes having young children while fighting a war very risky. And you expect some young lord to parent while you are away fighting? He has to answer the marshalls call too, and attack bandits, and defend seiges. Not much of a childhood.

So no, its not sexist, its realism.
Stfu about the politically correct BS.

Its not that a pregnant woman cant fight, its that in her physical condition she would be a target. easily captured and turning tides.

usually the supply train that had some whences in them back in viking ages, the women when pregnant were left in other villages.
Depending on how far into the pregnancy she is, after about half way she wouldn't be able to lift a sword or ♥♥♥♥ a crossbow.
Chikuwu May 9, 2016 @ 2:45am 
Originally posted by Axel MY CABBAGES!:
Originally posted by Chiku kickback.com:

Its not that a pregnant woman cant fight, its that in her physical condition she would be a target. easily captured and turning tides.

usually the supply train that had some whences in them back in viking ages, the women when pregnant were left in other villages.
Depending on how far into the pregnancy she is, after about half way she wouldn't be able to lift a sword or ♥♥♥♥ a crossbow.

Women of this time cant, but back then, even pregnant women worked the fields till the latest stages of pregnancy.

They were in much more fit condition to carry a baby, so if they could lift a hoe (Lol) they could lift a sword. But was it practical? no, and it was a liability.
Originally posted by Chiku kickback.com:
Originally posted by Axel MY CABBAGES!:
Depending on how far into the pregnancy she is, after about half way she wouldn't be able to lift a sword or ♥♥♥♥ a crossbow.

Women of this time cant, but back then, even pregnant women worked the fields till the latest stages of pregnancy.

They were in much more fit condition to carry a baby, so if they could lift a hoe (Lol) they could lift a sword. But was it practical? no, and it was a liability.
Yeah, but the point is that she would be absolutly no match for an armed man.
Chikuwu May 9, 2016 @ 2:49am 
Originally posted by Axel MY CABBAGES!:
Originally posted by Chiku kickback.com:

Women of this time cant, but back then, even pregnant women worked the fields till the latest stages of pregnancy.

They were in much more fit condition to carry a baby, so if they could lift a hoe (Lol) they could lift a sword. But was it practical? no, and it was a liability.
Yeah, but the point is that she would be absolutly no match for an armed man.

i tought the point was that are pregnant women able to fight? at least thats where this thing started from. not who she can match in the condition or not.

Theyre able to fight, but it wouldnt be practical. thats a non-sexist, realistic answer.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 45 comments
Per page: 1530 50