Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Im pretty sure you cant get pregnant yourself if you play a female.
there havent been anything in the wiki, other than ladies being able to carry offspring.
would break the game to be pregnant.
So no, its not sexist, its realism.
Stfu about the politically correct BS.
Its not that a pregnant woman cant fight, its that in her physical condition she would be a target. easily captured and turning tides.
usually the supply train that had some whences in them back in viking ages, the women when pregnant were left in other villages.
Women of this time cant, but back then, even pregnant women worked the fields till the latest stages of pregnancy.
They were in much more fit condition to carry a baby, so if they could lift a hoe (Lol) they could lift a sword. But was it practical? no, and it was a liability.
i tought the point was that are pregnant women able to fight? at least thats where this thing started from. not who she can match in the condition or not.
Theyre able to fight, but it wouldnt be practical. thats a non-sexist, realistic answer.