Mount & Blade: Warband

Mount & Blade: Warband

View Stats:
RAMBO Jul 17, 2017 @ 8:16am
Best units?
So hey guys I was wondering what are the best units in each faction?And what army combination should I make/ :)
< >
Showing 16-30 of 42 comments
khan_raider_alex Jul 18, 2017 @ 2:04am 
Tuidjy, thanks a lot! Never thought of this despite almost 1000 hours in game.

Specialist are better in seperate group anyway - stand on hill somewhere safe, like soldiers' camp in real life battle :)


Originally posted by jayy:
Putting better units in the back is probably a bad idea unless you're fighting a weaker opponent. Because that's just gonna make the weaker units in the front die anyways

Not alltogether bad idea - now I mostly play VC, and you can train your low tier soldies this way, and save your elites. I always in rage when some s*ty peasant with rocks kill my huskarl.

Typical battle is me holding fire, then move behind infantry making them rotate to you then archers fire, then infantry advance. When archers out of arrors I order them retreat. So i can do with low tier infantry and when enemies reinforcement arrives I won't be with my bloodied elites. I give it a try.
holyfail Jul 19, 2017 @ 4:23pm 
depends on who you're fighting, your ability to micromanage your troops positioning, and what you're doing. For pretty easy field battles some swadian knights in flat lands are pretty busted. For mountain terrain id say setting up some veigar marksmen or some rhodok crossbow marksmen will be the best with some good infantry. Against rhodoks.. you can get good positioning with some swadian knights but they're spearmen can stop your horses which is a problem if your knights are majorly lance based. Overall id run with some knights and crossbow marksmen (they're decent in melee too)

Sieging is different too, it feels like such a waste to use swadian knights in sieges.. pretty much any infantry with a shield can siege and add in those crossbow marksmen for pick offs and decent walls when they're out of bolts. Best infantry to use is nord huscarls however they take a bit of time to train vs other infantry that can still get the job done. If against rhodoks.. i havent tried this theory yet but i imagine using veigar infantry mostly behind a good amount of shielded units untill the enemy uses all their bolts would be theoretically good cause they usually come equiped with shield bonus weapons to break through those pesky board shields. My troop makeup is also dependant on who i join/am war with, clearly you can't roll into nord cities with huscarls cause they get huge morale penalties for fighting against their own kind.. so then a valid sub would be i'd say sargents and elite infantry units. (you can use archers btw in sieges, early on they get a lot of picks however i hate using them cause they just become cannon fodder when they run out of arrows and suck in melee, nord archers are ok though compared to viegar in melee)

So what i end up doing is setting up multuple armies in my castles, one for field battles and the other for sieging. (i don't run around with massive amounts of troops cause it causes morale penalties and they are fat and eat all your food way too quickly. only when i know i'm sieging and may have to field battle do i carry both, and usually its a balance to keep my army smaller) If you run around with huscarls and some crossbowers though you can probably win most field battles its just not as fast as using swadian knights. (only time i ever use khjert? units is for bandits lol, the mounted archers usually run down routers with help from like veigar knights or something faster and cheaper than swadian). Overall it all comes down to preference, desert dudes are all decent at everything but masters of none, and pretty sure.. their elite infantry lacks shields. Veigars are traditional archer baised, rhodoks are crossbow and spear/anti calvalry based, swadian is heavy calvalry, nords are infantry, and khjerts are pretty worthless.. just annoying. (although their lancers are pretty strong and if you underestimate them they'll kill some units)
Fresh Meat Jul 20, 2017 @ 12:24am 
Kind of depends on what you are looking for, not to mention most oppinions on what the best units really are, are just that; oppinions. Every unit can do well if used correctly by the player, some better than others obviously.

Cavalry: Usually people praise the swadian knight because it's "the absolute best unit in the game and all you need is an army of swadian knights omg so op blah blah". well they're not entirely wrong, Swadian knights are the best cavalry, however statwise The sarranid mamluk is almost equal to the swadian knight, but i found that they work best if you plan on making your money on capturing enemy units and selling them into slavery, since a lot of them tend to use blund weapons as a secondary.

Infantry: Nord Huscarl best melee unit, highest level and stats ez.
Depending on the situation hower I would also reccomend Rhodok sergeants for both sieging and defending castles. Some people might argue that swadian sergeants are better at sieging castles, and i guess that would be debatable. Rhodok sergeants do move slow, they are a very slow unit, however, nothing is going to break their shields easily making them tanks, essensially.

Archers: Not sure, I don't really like archers in this game, because they do ♥♥♥♥ damage, especially against shield users they wont even make a dent in them.
If i had to reccomend one archer unit though, I'd say sarranid master archer, not based on any stats or facts, but just because i like the way they pew pew. and are the most satisfying to slaughter too.

Crossbow: Rhodok sharpshooter, period.
Outclasses Swadian crossbowmen everyday, all day. frankly, all archer units too.

Garrison: I usually have a garrison mixture of rhodok sharpshooters/ vet crossbowmen and Nord warrior/ nord recruits. Nord recruits usually spawn with the best gear if you ask me.


Fresh Meat Jul 20, 2017 @ 1:07am 
Originally posted by jayy:
nord recruits can't even kill sea raiders, if you're gonna put meatshields in your garrison, atleast use nord footmen/trained footmen instead lol
It's not their purpouse to fight, they're there to up the garrison count to make it so the AI is less likely to be tempted to even start a siege. Eihter way, by your comment i can tell you have the intelligence of a potatoe, or you would have known that. Also, none of the recruits can really stand up to sea raiders.
Adahn (´ ᴥ `) Jul 20, 2017 @ 2:31am 
Originally posted by jayy:
Originally posted by Mauzi:
It's not their purpouse to fight, they're there to up the garrison count to make it so the AI is less likely to be tempted to even start a siege. Eihter way, by your comment i can tell you have the intelligence of a potatoe, or you would have known that. Also, none of the recruits can really stand up to sea raiders.
Funny how you're comparing my intelligence to an object that isn't even self aware, when you can't even spell potato. Moral of the story, if you want to fire shots at someones intellect, atleast use google translate... like, purpouse? What?

I've played Warband for 1200 hours and I do know, that having 400 recruits in your garrison won't prevent a Marshall, who is accompanied by a 1300 unit army, from sieging your fief. Have a nice day, good sir

Who no ♥♥♥♥ they will attack your castle when they outnumber your garrison. The point of the recruits is to lower the chances of being outnumbered therefore making it less likely to be invaded by individual lords.
Adahn (´ ᴥ `) Jul 20, 2017 @ 2:54am 
Originally posted by jayy:
Originally posted by Aurourus:

Who no ♥♥♥♥ they will attack your castle when they outnumber your garrison. The point of the recruits is to lower the chances of being outnumbered therefore making it less likely to be invaded by individual lords.
Are you okay? Literally everyone knows that upon starting a kingdom, one of your main priorities is putting troops in the garrison of your new capital to prevent individual lords from sieging the fief. What I said is that no matter how many recruits you put in it, it won't stop a marshall from amassing a 1000+ unit army and sieging it anyways. Seriously, learn to read.

How about you read the entire conversation. He said that it makes lords less likely to siege you and you said that's not true because it will still be sieges by marshalls. He was talking about invidual lords not marshalls. Learn how to read.
Adahn (´ ᴥ `) Jul 20, 2017 @ 3:00am 
Originally posted by jayy:
Originally posted by Aurourus:

How about you read the entire conversation. He said that it makes lords less likely to siege you and you said that's not true because it will still be sieges by marshalls. He was talking about invidual lords not marshalls. Learn how to read.

"It's not their purpouse to fight, they're there to up the garrison count to make it so the AI is less likely to be tempted to even start a siege. Eihter way, by your comment i can tell you have the intelligence of a potatoe, or you would have known that. Also, none of the recruits can really stand up to sea raiders. "

That's where my conversation with him started, and there's no mention of it being an individual lord. You can't lower your "chances" of being sieged because there aren't any chances, the AI will inevitably amass an army to siege fiefs with 5 to 1 odds. You know, kingdoms exist for a reason. There are lords... so they can counter the enemy lords when they invade. Unless you manage to not be at war for a long time you won't get a garrison of 1000 recruits. Learn to read, absolute numb nuts.

You can lower your chances of being sieged this is why anyone with a brain does it but it seems you are not intelligent enough to understand that it lowers your chances of being sieged by smaller lords. When a lord passes your castle and he can siege it, he will you common pepe.
Adahn (´ ᴥ `) Jul 20, 2017 @ 3:30am 
Originally posted by jayy:
Originally posted by Aurourus:

You can lower your chances of being sieged this is why anyone with a brain does it but it seems you are not intelligent enough to understand that it lowers your chances of being sieged by smaller lords. When a lord passes your castle and he can siege it, he will you common pepe.

There is no random chance of being sieged by a individual lord you imbecile, if you have a near-empty garrison the AI will automatically siege your castle by themselves, and when you fill the garrison up to a normal size, only marshalls will siege it.

That's what i said you vindaloo.
Adahn (´ ᴥ `) Jul 20, 2017 @ 3:30am 
lmao you're actually insulting people over the internet haha
Adahn (´ ᴥ `) Jul 20, 2017 @ 3:33am 
By the way my grammar and spelling is on point each time when i say something serious but you know. It's not like that hurts me when it's coming from a guy who has a private profile and actually get genuinely mad at a misunderstanding on the internet. In the end you were just saying the stuff i already said.
Adahn (´ ᴥ `) Jul 20, 2017 @ 3:33am 
Google what i vindaloo is haha. That's a real powerful insult :steamhappy:
Adahn (´ ᴥ `) Jul 20, 2017 @ 3:35am 
Originally posted by jayy:
Originally posted by Aurourus:
By the way my grammar and spelling is on point each time when i say something serious but you know. It's not like that hurts me when it's coming from a guy who has a private profile and actually get genuinely mad at a misunderstanding on the internet. In the end you were just saying the stuff i already said.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but forgetting to capitalize I isn't proper grammar.

Where did i forget to capitalize? I don't capitalize anything when i'm actually just laughing.
Adahn (´ ᴥ `) Jul 20, 2017 @ 3:38am 
Originally posted by jayy:
Originally posted by Aurourus:

Where did i forget to capitalize? I don't capitalize anything when i'm actually just laughing.
You don't capitalize i. lol

"Where did i forget to capitalize?" = wrong
"Where did I forget to capitalize?" = correct

Enjoy your lesson, grammar expert.

Hmm, I don't know i'm not the one trying to correct other people's mistakes on the internet haha. You're the one trying to do that. expertinio
Last edited by Adahn (´ ᴥ `); Jul 20, 2017 @ 3:39am
Adahn (´ ᴥ `) Jul 20, 2017 @ 3:42am 
Basically in the end you agreed that I was right.


Also don't get offended on the internet because you just look like a complete douche. You had a misunderstanding on the internet and the first thing you do is insult and get genuinely mad. You need to work on your anger management.
Adahn (´ ᴥ `) Jul 20, 2017 @ 3:43am 
Originally posted by jayy:
From your profile-

"If you are going to comment on my profile please start with a capital letter and end with a period and check your grammar and spelling because it just looks weird. (unless it's a meme i guess)"

Originally posted by Aurourus:

*facedesk* x10

Where is the mistake in that? Can't quite find it.
< >
Showing 16-30 of 42 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jul 17, 2017 @ 8:16am
Posts: 42