Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i hope that answers the question though it is confusing, but bastard swords tend to not do well one handed because of the way it swings, i always get penalties
I asked what the penalty for using bastard weapons one handed is. Guides, the wiki, and posts claim anything from 15% stat decrease, to 35% stat decrease, it isnt from the weapon slowing down, but an actual decrease in the value of both stats. I am wondering which value is the accurate one.
What all that means is pretty simple - Your weapon choice will be meaningful, how you use it is extremely important, and the ideal weapon for you is dependent on a great many variables that can't be predicted by third-parties.
These are all good things. There is no "one set of gear to rule them all" in Mount and Blade: Warband. However, there is one issue that isn't really debatable - During sieges, if you don't use a shield, you'll likely wish you had. :)
I wanted one piece of information, I do not care about other impacts on damage. All I am looking for is the numbers relating to use of one handed/two handed weapons in one hand, because the stats given are for two handed.
You even mention it in your post "dependent on a great many variables" Yes lovely, Im asking about one of those variables, it is a number, a percentage, which is applied when using a bastard weapon in one hand, I want to know what it is. Am I still not clear?
PS i believe they have a set of phrases for help threads, like "deres no da best stuff", "figure it by urself feg" and etc
Im nice to the people actually helping, but I hate having to repeat myself for the other people who cant bother to read what I asked and start telling me a bunch of irrelevant stuff about how speed impacts damage, twice. Literally both of them provided the same information, which i still didnt need. Im sure they are both fine people and all that, but their answers provided no help.
Yes, 35% is huge. It is also hardcoded quite deep, and is very hard to change. There are ways in which those penalties are changed in mods, but you will not believe how tricky and convoluted that is. (It involves multiple definitions in item_types, and a script to switch them on the fly)
In general, bаsтагd swords are not worth it unless:
- two-handed is your best proficiency (or you would be using a one handed sword)
- you have a decent one-handed proficiency (or you'll be helpless with a shield)
- you need the shield to protect yourself from arrows (in melee, your sword would be enough)
- the bаsтагd sword in question is not too much worse than the best two handed sword
If you are a one handed fighter, even considering using a bаsтагd sword instead is lunacy. Even if you are willing to accept the damage and speed penalty, if you lose your shield, you will automatically switch to the two handed style, and be at a huge disadvantage.
If you are a two handed fighter, in most cases you are better off using your shield with a free hand, and switching to a dedicated two hander once you get in close.
Personally I use bаsтагd swords in only two cases:
1) If, as a one-handed fighter, I'm playing a mod in which a bаsтагd sword happens to be so overpowered that even with the penalties, it outshines the best one handers. Of my favorites, there's a grand total of one such mod, and I still carry a backup one hander for when I lose my shield (as a page in my prayer book, so that I do not waste a slot on it.)
2) If, as a two handed fighter, I'm fighting in melee on horseback with a significant chance of taking ranged fire, for example, in Prophecy of Pendor. I'd be suffering the 35% penalty anyway, so it matters a lot less than usual. I'd still carry my favorite two hander, namely a Ruby flamberge.
----------
I know nothing to suggest that Perisno penalty is less than the usual 35%. My Perisno character is a one handed fighter with a decent two handed proficiency, so I will give it a test, next time I come across a bаsтагd sword.
As an aside, in real life, my favorite weapon is a longsword, i.e. what many call a bаsтагd sword. Warband's modeling does not do that Queen of swords justice. It's not that the 35% penalty is too high, it is not. It is that the stats on longswords and two handed swords are not as superior to the stats of one handers as they should be.
In tournaments, it's not necessarily an advantage unless your skills are up to par in case/when your shield breaks. Speed can be a real factor, there, IMO.