安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Bhelen is ruthless but he does actually improve the lot of the poorer dwarves, Harrowmont is mostly a incompetent boob (story-wise).
If you're willing to make your Warden a bit dirtier, go with Behlen, as it comes with a better 'result' for Orzammar.
If you're not willing to be that scummy, go with Harrowmont, but know that he doesn't really do Orzammar any favors.
I went with Harrowmont. It helped that the dwarves are the least appealing race for me in Origins :P. As long as I'm not utterly dooming them, I'm fine with my actions regarding them :P
Behlen is dirty as hell but Harrowmont is steeped in bigoted traditions.
I'm glad I didn't play a dwarf and had to deal with this. Go Human Mages and their ability to make Templar and Mage Circle work together! lol
As for Bhelan or Harrowmont, like everyone else said, they are both terrible. I guess it just depends on your views regarding entitlement. If you think bloodline royalty is important chose Bhelan, he's a prick, backstabber, liar and oportunist. But he is overall a better leader because he is so invested and dedicated ( obssed maybe? ) to ruling the kindom. On the other hand Harrowmont is your regular boring, without any sort of personality because he was always the king's second so he has become in my opinion just a copy of him. While stuck in the old ways and tradition he is also a more lenient ruler.
There's no good or bad choice, it's just a matter of personal prefference, depending on how they make you feel when you talk to them, which kinda sucks because this should be an important story plot.