Cod WW 2 is the worst and most boring Cod !

[NuketroxZ]

HI Guys,

I am a Cod Players/Fan since I played MW 2 first Time, and every year I bought Cod, but from year to year it got worst and worst, every year more unbalanced weapons, bad spawnsystem, bad matchmaking(SBM),WW 2 is the first Cod I didnt bought at release cause the beta already felt way off Cod.
And now I bought WW2 cause i am hyped on BO 4( I liked BO 3, even with bad weapon balance)
so after some games I jsut ask myself? is that a beta or what? Why u have unlimited run in a ww2 shooter? why weapons god zero recoil? why are there (semi) autoshotguns that are evem stronger then in the cods before? why I got under 100 FPS on low settings with a gtx 1070 r5 1600 and 16 gb ddr4 ram? This game feels exactly the same like AW just without boosting.
It isnt a classic movement cod, it doesnt feel like old times, only the scenario cant make a cod good.

[Xisnis]

i agree with it being boring/less fun in comparison to older cods

[Xisnis]

the only thing i do in this cod is doing the daily orders from major howard if they are fun at all of course

[Cariocong]

this franchise is crap, all my friends have always said that cod is crap but the second war theme really pleased me, a shame they were right, realism 0, hackers dominate, horrible servers, few players, expensive game for the which is offered and as if they were not enough they added zombies to the second war plus the exclusive zombie mode, total rubbish, I threw my money away but at least now I know how much this call of duty franchise is awful compared to aaa games of indie companies like squad or competitor battlefield

[NuketroxZ]

the F2P shooter Iron Sight is so much better, and feels way more like mw1/2 sad that a copy is better then original, I hope bo 4 is doing good

[A Chewy Pickle]

Ahroniz RIP Godziny の投稿を引用：

i agree with it being boring/less fun in comparison to older cods

Ahroniz RIP Godziny の投稿を引用：

the only thing i do in this cod is doing the daily orders from major howard if they are fun at all of course

Agreed, it really feels like they've hardly tried in making a fun game, with boring maps an stuff. Even blops3 had a fairly fun game even though i disliked the future theme. Like zombies, its good but after playing it a few times you're kinda tired of it. But the lack of creativity in map design is the worst by far, barely anything to climb over, move, barrels or cars to blow up, 3 lanes where you clearly see it's only 3 lanes. What happened to maps like Crossfire, Sainte-Mère-Église, Creek, Dome, Wasteland, a lot of the maps from cod 3, great design with differing scale. But now in this is all 3 lane tiny maps and nothing more. Even with War mode its still the same.

[Curious Incubus]

Hi, my name is (enter name here). I’ve been playing CoD since 20XX, certifying me an expert on what I’m talking about. What I’m about to say is important enough to illicit this by-the-numbers introduction and personal thread in the WW2 discussions.

This game is...

[NuketroxZ]

Curious Incubus の投稿を引用：

Hi, my name is (enter name here). I’ve been playing CoD since 20XX, certifying me an expert on what I’m talking about. What I’m about to say is important enough to illicit this by-the-numbers introduction and personal thread in the WW2 discussions.

This game is...

If you know something about Gamedesign, you would know why WW2 is bad

[Autumn_]

twitch.tv/nuketroxz の投稿を引用：

the F2P shooter Iron Sight is so much better, and feels way more like mw1/2 sad that a copy is better then original, I hope bo 4 is doing good

I played Ironsight for 3 days, personally, I think it's one of the worst games.
It looked alright.
But then you actually play it, and it's just 'bleh.'
You say it's a clone of CoD, but it feels nothing like it.
Only good thing it did in my book, is good hitreg. Other than that, the gun-play was wank, the person with the laser sight would outgun someone that aimed for headshots (Basically the only way to kill.), the whole unlock system was disapointing and P2W, the maps really weren't great, they made WW2 maps look good. The Graphics were alright...but eh.

[NuketroxZ]

Autumn の投稿を引用：

twitch.tv/nuketroxz の投稿を引用：

the F2P shooter Iron Sight is so much better, and feels way more like mw1/2 sad that a copy is better then original, I hope bo 4 is doing good

I played Ironsight for 3 days, personally, I think it's one of the worst games.
It looked alright.
But then you actually play it, and it's just 'bleh.'
You say it's a clone of CoD, but it feels nothing like it.
Only good thing it did in my book, is good hitreg. Other than that, the gun-play was wank, the person with the laser sight would outgun someone that aimed for headshots (Basically the only way to kill.), the whole unlock system was disapointing and P2W, the maps really weren't great, they made WW2 maps look good. The Graphics were alright...but eh.

ww 2 maps good? everymap plays the same 3 lines, where are maps lile Firing Range, Dome, Favelas, Dome or Terminal? Iron Sight is zero p2w daily missions gold, you can get every attachment just by play and lvl up the weapon. Atleast there is no auto shotgun with Fire Ammo that kills 1 shot from 10 meters. WW 2 = AW without boost

[Curious Incubus]

twitch.tv/nuketroxz の投稿を引用：

If you know something about Gamedesign, you would know why WW2 is bad

I wasn't talking about game quality in my first post. It is the cookie cutter format for how to write a generic and rant-heavy CoD review that I've seen hundreds of times. You used that ♥♥♥♥ like you were born with it.

I know about how bad a game WW2 is. Movements are sluggish, most weapons have obscene amounts of randomized recoil, the map pool is far too small and lacking in quality, and the class system allows for no flexibility. That, paired with the bad hitreg, the poor server quality and the lack of independent decisionmaking is what made WW2 a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ CoD game.

You don't seem to have a grasp on what actually makes the game bad, seeing that half of your complaints about gameplay seem to be in the vein of saying "I wanted ♥♥♥♥ pacing and bad gunplay." At the same time, you praise games like BO3 or (supposedly) MW2, which were both incredibly poorly designed CoD games, featuring many of the issues you seemed to levy against WW2, such as infinite running, no recoil, and ♥♥♥♥ optimization. Make up your mind.

[Shiroe (cortana)]

Cariocong 4i20 の投稿を引用：

this franchise is crap, all my friends have always said that cod is crap but the second war theme really pleased me, a shame they were right, realism 0, hackers dominate, horrible servers, few players, expensive game for the which is offered and as if they were not enough they added zombies to the second war plus the exclusive zombie mode, total rubbish, I threw my money away but at least now I know how much this call of duty franchise is awful compared to aaa games of indie companies like squad or competitor battlefield

...... zombies is the most played mode in the cod series, and its far better than any MP ever made.
And not to mention, mostly all cod cost exactly the same price for several years, look at Bo2, bo3,IW, ghosts and AW, they all cost the same and those games are way worse than ww2, while ww2 isnt a very good game, its damn far better than these crappy games.

[Pure & Rustic]

Bad... Its the best cod since MW3...

[NuketroxZ]

Pure & Rustic の投稿を引用：

Bad... Its the best cod since MW3...:moab:

nope, ww 2 is bad

[NuketroxZ]

Curious Incubus の投稿を引用：

twitch.tv/nuketroxz の投稿を引用：

If you know something about Gamedesign, you would know why WW2 is bad

I wasn't talking about game quality in my first post. It is the cookie cutter format for how to write a generic and rant-heavy CoD review that I've seen hundreds of times. You used that ♥♥♥♥ like you were born with it.

I know about how bad a game WW2 is. Movements are sluggish, most weapons have obscene amounts of randomized recoil, the map pool is far too small and lacking in quality, and the class system allows for no flexibility. That, paired with the bad hitreg, the poor server quality and the lack of independent decisionmaking is what made WW2 a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ CoD game.

You don't seem to have a grasp on what actually makes the game bad, seeing that half of your complaints about gameplay seem to be in the vein of saying "I wanted ♥♥♥♥ pacing and bad gunplay." At the same time, you praise games like BO3 or (supposedly) MW2, which were both incredibly poorly designed CoD games, featuring many of the issues you seemed to levy against WW2, such as infinite running, no recoil, and ♥♥♥♥ optimization. Make up your mind.

MW 2 has infinite running? I think not, no recoil? Weapons got recoil not much but it had recoil. ♥♥♥♥ optimization? I got way better FPS in mw 2 then in ww2, even with my old PC^. Bo 3, is way better optimized(144fps on highest settings not 60-70 like ww2), yes it got also bad weapon balance(brecci etc) but weapon balance is in every cod a problem, even if the shotguns are jsut too stupid op,and infninite running fits perfect to the playstyle of Bo 3, but not too a ww2 boots on the ground cod that should play slowy , look at waw that was agreat ww 2 cod shooter, or cod 2. I have grasp why the cod WW 2 is bad

[Curious Incubus]

twitch.tv/nuketroxz の投稿を引用：

MW 2 has infinite running? I think not, no recoil? Weapons got recoil not much but it had recoil. ♥♥♥♥ optimization? I got way better FPS in mw 2 then in ww2, even with my old PC^. Bo 3, is way better optimized(144fps on highest settings not 60-70 like ww2), yes it got also bad weapon balance(brecci etc) but weapon balance is in every cod a problem, even if the shotguns are jsut too stupid op,and infninite running fits perfect to the playstyle of Bo 3, but not too a ww2 boots on the ground cod that should play slowy , look at waw that was agreat ww 2 cod shooter, or cod 2. I have grasp why the cod WW 2 is bad

- MW2 had Marathon. Infinite sprint, making it the most practical tier 1 perk to use in MW2, alongside SoH pro.
- MW2 weapons all had less recoil than the weapons in WW2. Take the F2000, the highest recoil AR in MW2. It has a very similar recoil pattern to the M1941 in WW2, but it shoots a whopping 150rpm faster.
- MW2 is the most unfinished CoD to ever exist on PC. Anything bad that could happen in a port, happened in MW2.
- BO3 has the worst mouse input, required a PC tower as powerful as the Starship Enterprise to function like the other CoD games, and had design elements that did not cater to PC players in any way, shape, or form.
- The movement system in BO3 is a high-functioning gimmick. Barely useful in a gunfight, and made the player a massive target whenever he wasn't trying to boost up to the moon. Even with infinite sprint the game felt sluggish as all hell.

WW2, even with infinite sprint is one of the more sluggish CoD games to exist due to its map design, weak and unsatisfying gunplay, and latent player controls. The presence of infinite sprint doesn't affect bad pacing. That's just a typical scapegoat/excuse that CoD naysayers perpetuate because CoD "needs" more realism.