Call of Duty: WWII - Multiplayer

Call of Duty: WWII - Multiplayer

View Stats:
rigged & manipulated
I don't write much on a forum, but this is worth mentioning.
I experienced already a lot of strange odds, so I started paying attention to it:

from the moment I have an order to win x matches, I get ALWAYS appointed to the losing team, on which I have no control.
So read this:
over the last 2 days, I played dozens of matches, and I was NOT 1 TIME in the winning team...dozens of times...and not 1 time a winning team !! while I was first, in my losing team, several times !!!!

I already heared things like this from other players here in my city (not on forums), but I didn't believe it...
well I can assure you now: the teamplay is manipulated and rigged...
some things are almost statistically impossible:

the chance that you are put in a losing team is 1/2,
so the chance you are put there 10 times in a row is about 1/1400 or about 0,07 % !!!

so what about dozens of times ????

< >
Showing 1-15 of 24 comments
l!ptor[BE] Mar 29, 2018 @ 10:54am 
If you enter a game whos already begon, yes the chances are big that you are on the loosing team because there were less players and people with a bad game leave easyer a game.

For the rest if you are playing from the start, the game doesn't make you loose that rubbish.
eLe| LisaUQQ Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:23am 
there was an atricle about actv. putting crappy players on teams together...in hopes they will want to buy crates and think they need to "pay to win" and be "good"....
MinorThreat-NL Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:27am 
Originally posted by eLe| LisaUQQ:
there was an atricle about actv. putting crappy players on teams together...in hopes they will want to buy crates and think they need to "pay to win" and be "good"....

And you can't remember the source, do you??
eLe| LisaUQQ Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:35am 
Originally posted by MinorThreat-NL:
Originally posted by eLe| LisaUQQ:
there was an atricle about actv. putting crappy players on teams together...in hopes they will want to buy crates and think they need to "pay to win" and be "good"....

And you can't remember the source, do you??
ill look...think pc gamer wrote it
Valco Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:41am 
Interesting, but as cod looks right now i wouldnt even doubt it
Xwurp Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:42am 
well Ive never had any trouble winning matches while having any of those orders active so no, just play better than ur team and enemy and u will win
˜lokkandload˜™ Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:44am 
Activision wants you to buy their gear so you can GIT GUDDER..
Xwurp Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:45am 
and why the hell would anyone start paying for sdrops if they loose? lol
Xwurp Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:46am 
theres never been anything uve needed from any drop (extra) content to git gud in any cod game so no
˜lokkandload˜™ Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:47am 
well since every damn thing in the market in WW2 is cosmetic, this really means nothing. Maybe in AW or IW or BO3 where market purchases unlocked totally new weapons with better abilities....then yeah.
Xwurp Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:49am 
there was not a single "extra" gun in bo3 that was better than the original guns and neither in any cod evry new weapon is just a "new" version of an equally based original gun nothign else
Xwurp Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:51am 
I got every gun in bo3 and wwii and almsot all in iw and no one is better than the originals
Xwurp Mar 29, 2018 @ 11:51am 
never paid anything extra and never will thats jsut stupid
< >
Showing 1-15 of 24 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 29, 2018 @ 10:35am
Posts: 24