Graphics look very bad

[Wolfie]

Like games from 2012. Not good

[MudFarm]

Another private profile troll. Game looked fine in the beta if you correctly adjusted resolution settings.

[UK Old Git]

Originally posted by Rocket Man:

Like games from 2012. Not good

Perhaps you bought your PC in 2012

[Jinn-Gon Qui]

Originally posted by Mud Farm:

Another private profile troll. Game looked fine in the beta if you correctly adjusted resolution settings.

How typical of them...

[ThinBeagle]

Originally posted by UK Old Git:

Originally posted by Rocket Man:

Like games from 2012. Not good

Perhaps you bought your PC in 2012

Owned

[NVIDIA]

Originally posted by Rocket Man:

Like games from 2012. Not good

a korean jerk bad stupid ppl ever

[Push the button]

While it certainly doesn't look bad (it uses the id Tech engine that always looks lovely) it does look identcal to the last 4-5 games because of that same engine being re-re-re-used. Activision have the 3 developer teams by the balls so they can't do much other than produce new-but-not-new content each time.

I do love id Tech games though.

[BababooeyHTJ]

Originally posted by Push the button:

While it certainly doesn't look bad (it uses the id Tech engine that always looks lovely) it does look identcal to the last 4-5 games because of that same engine being re-re-re-used. Activision have the 3 developer teams by the balls so they can't do much other than produce new-but-not-new content each time.

I do love id Tech games though.

Just 4-5?

Not trying to troll, I honestly don't know. I haven't touched CoD since MW2 which looked just like CoD4 to me.

[Push the button]

Well, I think they upgraded the engine when Ghosts was released (or a game near then) but things have stayed the same since.

[Vote Reform]

Originally posted by Mud Farm:

Another private profile troll. Game looked fine in the beta if you correctly adjusted resolution settings.

This.
Not next gen but they arent years old looking.

[Shai`tan]

I think the largest problem experienced is by those who ran their Brightness too high. At the beginning of beta startup they tell you to adjust. Brightness for your monitor. I played with that setting and noticed when Brightness is too high, the game looked washed out. And texture details didn`t pop as well as when you turn the Brightness setting down to a proper setting for your monitor.

On youtube for example, many vids posted you could clearly see their monitor brightness was way too high. Total washout. No pop. The best most detailed vid footage had the brightness set lower, and the darks were darker, colors more vivid.... and more texture detail etc.

[Push the button]

thanks for that info, shai

[namresaw33]

Maybe update that potato you got there.

[BURZUM]

well, it was the beta but i really did not see any improvements since advanced warfare

[Colts]

Originally posted by RabidUrko:

Originally posted by Mud Farm:

Another private profile troll. Game looked fine in the beta if you correctly adjusted resolution settings.

This.
Not next gen but they arent years old looking.

If its not next gen then its just the first engine they released on DirectX 11 which would make the graphics 2012-13. This doesn't mean the graphics are going to be bad by any means but they definitley are outdated.

[Push the button]

Some people want constant progression with engines each sequal but this reaction usually hides other issues like stale content and mechanics. If a game had amazing content then people wouldn't mind a 15 year old engine being used.