Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Talking about an all Eastern Front only no jumping between fronts. Not some game that has half of missions on Western Front then other half on the East but solely sits on the Eastern Front.
People actually believe this lmao.
Hitler and Tojo were not communicating and Hitler was already planning to declare war on the US. The Western Allies did keep a lot of German troops busy on two fronts while the USSR fought on the Eastern Front. If Germany had defeated the UK and had a clear Western front, the war in the East could easily have ended very differently. The USSR didn't win on its own, it was a group effort. Without the Lend-Lease act and General Winter, Moscow would have fallen and the USSR with it. Germany screwed up at Stalingrad by going for the city instead of going around and cutting off support. The city would have fallen quickly and Germany would have been free to take the southern oil fields. This has already been discussed and proven. Tjhe Soviets did bear a huge burden, but their own military policies did as much damage tot heir own troops as the Germans did.
http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Gustav_Cannon
Kind of... hypocritical, that the game is titled WWII only to be set during the battles between the Americans and the Germans. I guess the title is misleading as a whole to a lot of aspects about the game.
Agreed. Granted, Call of Duty 3 did similar things by focusing on the Battle of Normandy and giving us 4 Western Allied perspectives (US, Britain/French Marquis, Canada, and Poland), but like ou said that didn'thave "WWII" in the title.
Though I could see a similar treatment working for the Eastern Front. (Soviet, Polish, Czech. Yugoslav (?))
Call of Duty 3 wasn't bad at all then...
I just hope there will be at least DLC campaigns. This would truly make the game one of the bests because of the title.
Oh yep.. Lots of troops on western front.. Opening wiki we see whaat? 8 million nazi troops surrendered @ all.. Wow! Easy! Kinda hella lots of.
Eastern front? - Meeh.. Sh*ty 1.6 million nazis. Bt w8! what is it? Oh no! 6 fking million soviet army. Poor nazis... Damn soviets having fking daytime on our loan!
Don't pay attantion on Casualties, Who gives a fk about it?!
Oh wh@ about Land-Lease? Danm brittish! Coudn't they gave it up allready! We paid 3 times more for one B-Ben then for Uncle Joe... Oh don't forget, pls, russians paid 4 it.
General Winter - NO COMMENT, wakes up only if english/french/german/swedish troops presented in Russia/Ukraine/Belarus/blah blah...
" ...Germany screwed up at Stalingrad by going for the city instead of going around,,," - you are sooo funy, fking hillarious, ma friend, don't ya. I don't really think u believe in what you typed here. But you as the Brave mrcan scout, didn't have the way around to leave it be.
Read wiki, carefully. With all pop-up hidden windows near numbers. And if you have something left in yur head you probably find out something unusual.
- I DONT LOVE YOU NOMORE! Stpid Adolf! I'M NOT TALKING 2 U ANYMORE!
OMFG I'm fkg destroyed by this guy!
What's your F'N point? Contribute or get lost.
& what is yours, great general? Your "could be" strategy is idiotic as well as if your grandma had a Dk you could call her garndpa. U r Fkng hillarious, don't u see?
"Could be strategy" is a F'N fact. Go read a real book and stay off of wiki.
No, it's not. Just because u want 2 beleave in it doesn't bring it as a fact.
Already read quite a lot, thanks. I see you've read one and take it 4 granted.
Oh yey, another Land-Lease dummy... ONE MORE TIME! Russians paid 4 it. And just 4 fun find out how many T-34 tanks had they produced during the whole war. (62 thousand in only 2 modifications) Land Lease geve them 11 thousand US tnaks in a row. The most useful and tasty delivery was jeep. It was 400.000 jeeps delivered all in all.
5,24 million nazis died on eastern front and 5,45 captured as prisoners. Feel free to observe this on any resourse. So, imagine the road of 6.2 thousand of miles build of dead bodies. It's like a bridge from China to San Francisco. And that is only nazis...
My point is not to f*ck around with you trying to persuade you that americans did nothing @ western front. (They bombed Dresden till the ground floor btw, most industrial city in Germany if you didn't know, lol) Russians've lost in that war much more than you can imagine even in your spooky dreams. Tha's why they are so obsessed if sombody doesn't mention the Red army and Soviet nation income in this victory.
U know so little about this war, especially about Eastern front. Btw, how many of you knew that russians fought japaneese forces in China?
I'm done with all this talks.