Low FPS how to fix it?

[ZehLukk]

Hi everyone, i just downloaded the game but i'm having low fps performance.

I have a GTX 770 2gb, 16GB ram and a i7 2600 3.40 ghz processor.
Even with the lowest settings i can't play with 30 fps.

Can someone help me?

[Satsujin Jiken]

This is just an extremely demanding game, you "can get away with" using a 960 / 970 from last year but you will want the $400+ cards released not half a year ago :(

[I Want Your Mom]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Satsujin Jiken:

This is just an extremely demanding game, you "can get away with" using a 960 / 970 from last year but you will want the $400+ cards released not half a year ago :(

This is not an extremely demanding game, this is extremely badly optimized/ported game. It's absolutely different and doesn't worth buying $400+ card.

[ZehLukk]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von I Want Your Mom:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von 0101:

With your specifications, your game can barely run with 25 FPS on minimum with 1920x1080, try lowering your resolution to 1280x720.

A 2nd Generation Intel processor is going to choke on this game, you need a more recent processor or a much better graphic card.

This has nothing to do with hardware. I can run Doom 2016 on maximum settings and it runs without a slightest slow down. Quantum Break is a pure console game, which has low quality textures, blurry grapics and overall mediocre picture, but plays like you're under water with a plastic bag on your head.

This isn't the first time, when direct console port kills the game itself. It might be suitable for console lovers, but for us, PC guys, it's not. Just another good game killed by poor porting.

That`s probably why the price on Steam is a lot cheaper (something around 65% in Brazil) than Xbox One Store.

[Satsujin Jiken]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von I Want Your Mom:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Satsujin Jiken:

This is just an extremely demanding game, you "can get away with" using a 960 / 970 from last year but you will want the $400+ cards released not half a year ago :(

This is not an extremely demanding game, this is extremely badly optimized/ported game. It's absolutely different and doesn't worth buying $400+ card.

"Demanding" is a neutral word where I consciously didn't imply whether to me the visuals match the need for processing power. Try it sometime.

[Alex Hang]

I'm running 16 gb of ram, an FX-8370 and a GTX 1060, that's easily ahead of the recommended specs yet when I set everything to ultra I was getting 20fps

[Hei]

I have found out what the issue is. Though I don't know how to fix it. It seems as though the game just won't use any of the hardware to it's maximum potential. My CPU runs at about 50% - 55% for all threads. My GPU stays at 40% - 55% (with one small spike to 60%). My RAM stays below 50% usage. Hopefully this will allow someone to fix their issues.

On another note with these issues. I tried using exclusive fullscreen mode with the game. GPU usage stayed the same however when I went to my desktop my GPU usage would suddenly stayed around 80% instead of ~48%.

[opjose]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Satsujin Jiken:

This is just an extremely demanding game, you "can get away with" using a 960 / 970 from last year but you will want the $400+ cards released not half a year ago :(

It runs very well @ 1920x1080 with 970's, on High, with some settings set to Ultra (not textures nor shadows in this case ).

You do need to turn off upscaling, and make sure the game is set to "Full Screen Exclusive mode".

It runs even better with an SLI 970 config when set to "Alternate frame rendering". I've tried it with upscaling on in this configuration and did not see a big FPS penalty.

I haven't tested 960's though.

[Gabriel Angelos]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von opjose:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Satsujin Jiken:

This is just an extremely demanding game, you "can get away with" using a 960 / 970 from last year but you will want the $400+ cards released not half a year ago :(

It runs very well @ 1920x1080 with 970's, on High, with some settings set to Ultra (not textures nor shadows in this case ).

You do need to turn off upscaling, and make sure the game is set to "Full Screen Exclusive mode".

It runs even better with an SLI 970 config when set to "Alternate frame rendering". I've tried it with upscaling on in this configuration and did not see a big FPS penalty.

I haven't tested 960's though.

960 is no better than a 770 so I wouldn't bother.

R9 290 x is more like a 970 and thats more the minimum for AAA games nowadays.

My old rig has a i7 2600k and asus strix 970 and runs this game just fine at high/ultra.. Its your graphics card OP.

[artt160]

ok so i'm running on a integrated gfx laptop 2.4ghz 8gb ddr4 ram.

I turned everything off except the one setting that says that it hinders performance badly to turn it off. then i set my gfx to...

anti-aliasing mode = use application settings
anti-aliasing method = adaptive multisampling
morphological filtering = off
anisotropic filtering mode = use application settings
texture filtering mode = use application settings
texture filtering quality = performance
surface format optimization = off
wait for virtual refresh = off
opengl triple buffering = off
shader cache = off
tessellation mode = override application settings
maximum tessellation level = off

and then run the program with the added condition (right click the game and press "set launch options") -noblur

while it's not perfect, it's playable on my craptop.

I will be playing with my radon settings later, but I played through act 1 and most of act 2 with almost no slowdown during combat. I hope this is more helpful than what the "bad port" (I agree) and "buy a console" (stfu i'm not even buying a new desktop until I can afford to buy a house unless my fiancé wants one) trolls had to "add" to the conversation.

if you can't actually help, don't post because there are people who experiment until there is a solution. That's why we love computers over consoles. They may be more "work", but they're so much more capable than a console because you can change all these settings and run games like this on a 300 dollar laptop instead of a 400 dollar console. Then I don't have to pay 60 dollars, I can just wait for it to hit my humble bundle instead.

I am cheap, not dumb.

[ButtGravy]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von DolphinVi:

I'm running 16 gb of ram, an FX-8370 and a GTX 1060, that's easily ahead of the recommended specs yet when I set everything to ultra I was getting 20fps

Your cpu is terrible tho

[Space Coward]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von ButtGravy:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von DolphinVi:

I'm running 16 gb of ram, an FX-8370 and a GTX 1060, that's easily ahead of the recommended specs yet when I set everything to ultra I was getting 20fps

Your cpu is terrible tho

FX processors are fine. I can get 40-50 FPS without a problem in this game on an R9 280, which is by no means a new card.

Just be mindful of certain settings and leave upscaling on, the game runs as expected if you know what you're doing. I'd also recommend uninstalling and reinstalling drivers considering that a GTX 1060 should be running significantly better than my own card.

[Bigshrimp]

I have a 6800K 6-core processor with 16GB of ram and a GTX 1070 and the game runs smooth on 1080p with everything on ultra with no low settings.