Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This might be a reason why
Also because COPPA exists
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children's_Online_Privacy_Protection_Act
Regarding COPPA, I don't know whether RecRoom falls under US juristiction or not, and if it did, as a parent I can always choose whether I want to give my consent or not. Right now, I don't even have that option.
COPPA was honestly just my best guess since social games can bring out the worst in the worst people.
I just got a Vive recently and haven't had a chance to set it up yet. I have no idea what to expect from the Rec Room. Only VR stuff I've done was at a demo in a microsoft store.
It doesn't matter if it falls under US jurisdiction or not. In most countries - including the US - the age of consent for basic business capacities, such as forming contracts, is above the age of 12 until you hit full legal competence by becomming an adult. Although it's evaluated as a case by case basis. In previous roman empires it is usually a fixed age. So even without that law, a minor couldn't legally make use of the majority of services and would result in the termination of any associated information or any invalid contracts. Including Steam, by the way. Even if they weren't violating the privacy rights of minors in the first place. All the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act does, is giving any US based companies a fixed age whereas most of the EU has embedded it into their common law. You are right that you can usually consent with your child or extend those capabilities, but that's reserved for teenagers. For a preteen you still can't consent with them, but rather you step into their shoes so to say and become responsible instead Eg. any and all contracts would be with you.
There's also an error with the privacy policy of recroom anyway regarding this subject.
[...]
The error here is that RecRoom is refered to as "Game" when "Website" is written down, rendering that policy useless. You have to refer to Game and Website (As it is doing for the most part already) or you have to define the whole thing as a single service. Technically the age restriction only applies to two websites and if you create a membership, since there's no mention of "Game" in it.
https://www.againstgrav.com/terms-of-service/
is fortunately correct, but the privacy policy and the steam EULA aren't in line with the wording.
Just a little something I've noticed, not that it would even matter.
Maybe ban the ones behaving inappropriately, rather than those who might hear what they say...?