Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Translated :
"Does this game offer a challenge?
If yes, and if you aren't pissed-off and throwing a tantrum about it and generally being negative and disagreeable person, then that means you are a 'brain-washed indoctrinated defender who can't think for themself'.
Everyone elses' point-of-view is "BS" and I ignore other people's thoughts because I refuse to converse with other people who's views don't already agree with my own, or to ever learn anything in my life again, and I am too insecure to have my opinion challenged by something I don't already believe, and I wouldn't be able to defend my point of view anyway, and as I've already explained, I can't handle a challenge.
Nobody should explain their point of view because that's "BS". And now I am going to explain my point of view. Ahem, the bottom line is..."
AI cheats like crazy.
Or all the other super cheaty stuff that they do.
I guess the devs decided its better to just cheat like crazy rather than model the AI based on actual tiles and stuff produced. This prevents cheezing the AI in some ways such as cutting off food tiles or whatever. But it also basically removes the players ability to do any real strategic attacks either since it doesnt actually matter how many peons you kill or which zones you take.
You couldn't have worded it better mate. Exactly how I feel and I would like to add:
AI cheating is ok in small measures but needs to be bound to game rules. There must be strategy to beat the AI and not sheer power and RNG, that's not an RTS kind of AI. Imagine you play a First person shooter and the moment the AI has vision of you , you die instantly to a headshot. Now you respawn, get to the same area but instead you toss a grenade to the side KNOWING he's gonna do that, because that's all he does, just stand there like a moron and now congratulations you've beaten the AI. Is that gameplay? I'd expect him to patrol, do more stuff. Many games usually will offer the kind of gameplay from RTS so it's not an unacceptable request from the players of this game. I'd suggest you pass. If I knew ahead of time just how bad the AI is at extreme I wouldn't play so much (My time spent was mostly on creating maps)
My point is: Your ai is unrealistic ♥♥♥♥. Amount of damage i did to enemy would have put down player easily. Ai still lived under CONSTANT raids. And even PROSPERED ENOUGH FOR A RELIC AND ARMY INCREASE. AND THAT WAS NORMAL AI. I AM VERY DIASATISFIED.
What is the point then? There is none. Absolute rampant cheating and it has gone up over the years, used to play 3-4 years ago just fine with not much problem and only minimal cheating from the AI.
Also very obvious that the AI cheat when most of them at the exact same time get upgrades to military path or construct relics.
I like how the OP predicted this post. And you went for it anyway! Delicious irony.