Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I've gotten 'Kill one more civilian and you have to redo this mission' message once, when I got tired of the extraction of Jensen after failing it three times in a row, 2 of the times due to rebels shooting him when I dragged him to the car!?
So by then I improvised with the grenade launcher and he didn't even get to his second loction, and the civilians still jumped like lemmings in front of my car, but they failed to sabotage the mission, with their eagerness to try to check the pressure of my tires in full speed.
They dont die :(
Want a way to torture them :(
I had never noticed kids in the game until I saw those.
But these are the Post-Fallout 1 and 2 days.. so guess I'd be a long time 'til we are able to shoot them if we want.
(Far Cry 5 on the other hand is actually more tasteless, as it forces people to run over animals for challenege events.. but not a single child in 'Montana' Oh and the Witches challenge in GRW forces you to kill animals too, and so far I haven't seen a single hostile animal in Virtual Bolivia?)
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1339015194
Since you go around killing people in these games though I don't see why hunting animals is of any concern.
Guess you never played Fallout 1 and 2? And noticed the consequenses of killing shildern? (pixels)
I like most animals a lot more then most humans..and children isn't classed as any of those in my book (as anyone who worked on a restaurant can only agree with) and as it's still onlypixels of 3d models were talking about the difference is close to none.
Doesn't make me go out an snipe my neighbors anyway
From FMJ:
"How can you shoot women or children?"
"Easy! Ya just don't lead 'em so much! Ain't war hell?"
I'm not saying whether it's right or wrong, or if it'll make you go out and kill someone, but I can understand why people would be uncomfortable with allowing it in games.
Just because you like animals more doesn't mean it's tasteless; the vast majority of people would be much more uncomfortable killing another human than an animal, and many would find the murdering of a child much more despicable than an adult.
I would not put killing animals in the same boat as killing children, personally, but I agree that the act of murdering pixels as a whole would put any of these into the same category as it's pointless at the end of the day to the sane person who can stomach it. Is it worth the controversy from a developers point of view though? Not normally.
A lot of people talk big about loving animals and how terrible humans are compared to them, but very few would put an animal's life over another human if they were given a choice.