Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's just not practical to make stables for this because you want some space for them to get the numbers; certainly more than 96 tiles of space. That's barely a puddle and all my tanks are even larger than that normally. The lake was probably ten times that, if not more. I considered building a small room with a station at the bottom of the lake with the doors open, to see if it would be used. But I decided that it would be a poor use of my duplicants' time even if they would use it, and I never tried it.
The best way I've found is to breed them in one tank or lake until they frequently get the overcrowded modifier, and then remove the feeder and build one somewhere else. It's basically the cap on that particular body of water for how many fish there can be there. But you can place a feeder in every body of water you find with a fish in it if you want to keep it simple, basically moving the feeder from pool to pool. I am assuming here that they stop breeding further once they get the overcrowded modifier, although it is hard to count them at a certain point. Fry are particularly hard to spot. But as far as I know there is no benefit to feeding a stocked up pool, other than turning the algae into polluted dirt I suppose. But you're better off stocking up somewhere else then I think. Fish in a new pool will both produce dirt and increase their numbers for more meat long term, while the fish in the old pool will only produce dirt.
From my experience with the lake I am now wondering if gulps don't actually clean water if they are being fed. i had more than 20 of them and never once saw the gulping animation I have seen before while not feeding them algae. And I couldn't notice much of a difference in the quantity of clean water either. So they just might eat PH2O and produce clean H2O if they are hungry. Not sure though. Perhaps someone knows.
I have used traps when I have an empty pool that I want to stock. But usually you can get by simply by scanning the area above the pool and releasing any water there that contains fish into the tank you want stocked. "Keep it simple" is my motto!
First is that it is literally impossible to keep up with feeding them long term. A single Pacu eats more algae per day than an entire ranch of Pufts can produce per day.
Second is that they won't die off if you stop feeding them. They will continue laying one egg per lifecycle when you stop feeding them.
So why feed them? They lay eggs much faster when fed. The usefulness of Pacus is that for an initial cost you can set them up and get thier population established. After that they will keep laying one egg per lifecycle then dying and leaving meat behind. Its a constant source of meat with only an upfront cost.
unbearable!