Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The thing you also missed is that the exit of the mini-excavator is defined relative to the tracks and not the cabin. If you rotate the cabin 180 degrees relative to the tracks, you exit on the wrong side.
This also causes a problem with exiting the cab when something is blocking the door. It is not blocking the door when you enter it.....
New team are a fresh set of model-makers (using cad-files from manufactorers and still getting it wrong) and they don't have a clue about simulating ..... or how not to deliver sloppy work.
It pretty much is though. In an economics simulation you need to be aware about how much money you can make with any given machine, otherwise you'll go bankrupt if you've more expenditures than earning due to ignoring the potential of the stuff you've bought. Like you're not gonna earn enough to pay like 100k of loan payments with a small excavator, because it is physically not capable of digging up enough gold for it.
So the bucket size of an excavator has no relevance to the amount of gold is gathered.
This statement of yours goes quite nicely with your ignorance on how the game is developed. Lots of mouth, absolutely no experience to back it up. 2024 thuglife. LOL