What did we do to you?

[Adolfo Bisi]

well some of the levels from chapter 11-15 feels like Anton is just punishing us , pure deliberate pain.
I really wish that some time in the future you can add a level (not chapter) selector for those who completed them all, because some of them are really enjoyable and I want to repeat often, while others I don't even want to remember that they exist.

[[RUST]Grumplestiltskin]

This is for the 8.5 years of questions/demands about multiplayer, hands, human targets, etc. :-P

[Cool Cereal]

Originally posted by RUSTGrumplestiltskin:

This is for the 8.5 years of questions/demands about multiplayer, hands, human targets, etc. :-P

Don’t forget the requests to add it to the quest store!

[ReverendTed]

Y'know what's also worthy of retribution?
Incessant requests for addition of the C7A1 and C7A2 rifles. ;-p

[LilNilbog]

the punishments are entirely deserved

[Gracey Face]

Originally posted by RUSTGrumplestiltskin:

This is for the 8.5 years of questions/demands about multiplayer, hands, human targets, etc. :-P

Actually a question I saw asked once which has puzzled me is that someone asked you if you were ever going to add a Davey Crockett to the game and you said you'll never add anything nuclear as you're ideologically against nuclear weapons (I don't think you said specifically why). But I can't think of any reason that you'd be so opposed to nuclear weapons that you wouldn't include them in a game that should not also apply to just firearms and weapons in general.

As such I am wondering what the opposition you have to nuclear weapons is? (Ones in games of course. Being blown up by a nuclear bomb is something most people are opposed to in reality.)

[Cool Cereal]

Originally posted by Gracey Face:

Originally posted by RUSTGrumplestiltskin:

This is for the 8.5 years of questions/demands about multiplayer, hands, human targets, etc. :-P

Actually a question I saw asked once which has puzzled me is that someone asked you if you were ever going to add a Davey Crockett to the game and you said you'll never add anything nuclear as you're ideologically against nuclear weapons (I don't think you said specifically why). But I can't think of any reason that you'd be so opposed to nuclear weapons that you wouldn't include them in a game that should not also apply to just firearms and weapons in general.

As such I am wondering what the opposition you have to nuclear weapons is? (Ones in games of course. Being blown up by a nuclear bomb is something most people are opposed to in reality.)

Probably because they are weapons of mass destruction that cause human suffering for generations. It’s really not that hard to understand the differences between firearms + conventional explosives and nuclear weapons.

[Gracey Face]

Originally posted by Cool Cereal:

Originally posted by Gracey Face:

Actually a question I saw asked once which has puzzled me is that someone asked you if you were ever going to add a Davey Crockett to the game and you said you'll never add anything nuclear as you're ideologically against nuclear weapons (I don't think you said specifically why). But I can't think of any reason that you'd be so opposed to nuclear weapons that you wouldn't include them in a game that should not also apply to just firearms and weapons in general.

As such I am wondering what the opposition you have to nuclear weapons is? (Ones in games of course. Being blown up by a nuclear bomb is something most people are opposed to in reality.)

Probably because they are weapons of mass destruction that cause human suffering for generations. It’s really not that hard to understand the differences between firearms + conventional explosives and nuclear weapons.

More suffering has been caused by normal firearms than has been caused by nukes and even if we wiped ourselves out tomorrow the scales would be the same rough order of magnitude.

That doesn't make sense.

[[RUST]Grumplestiltskin]

I don't care if it makes sense to anyone. I find it in poor taste, so I'm not doing it. I have nothing further to say on it.

[Cool Cereal]

Originally posted by Gracey Face:

Originally posted by Cool Cereal:

Probably because they are weapons of mass destruction that cause human suffering for generations. It’s really not that hard to understand the differences between firearms + conventional explosives and nuclear weapons.

More suffering has been caused by normal firearms than has been caused by nukes and even if we wiped ourselves out tomorrow the scales would be the same rough order of magnitude.

That doesn't make sense.

Compare the yield and long term effects of 1 bullet to that of 1 nuclear bomb. Not the total fatalities of both throughout all of history. You’ll start to understand the where I’m coming from.

This isn’t even touching on the morality or ethics of the use of them which is a whole other can of worms.

[Rockethead293]

100 guns + 100 magazines can do a lot of damage.
100 nuclear weapons can destroy a planet's entire population.
Nuclear weapons are, as of now, effectively impossible to use for good.
You can use guns to hunt, or protect yourself, or drive nails into walls, or a slew of other things.
There is no contest.


Also, where would you fire off a nuke in h3vr? I don't even think there's a big enough map.

[[RUST]Grumplestiltskin]

This is a silly conversation / argument for you folks to continue. We're speaking about a game. Not actual weapons. At the end of the day, as I said above, I made a curatorial decision based upon my own feelings of what is or isn't in poor taste, which is actually the only input of relevance, given well... we make the game. Y'all should really move on with your day.

[Gracey Face]

Originally posted by RUSTGrumplestiltskin:

I don't care if it makes sense to anyone. I find it in poor taste, so I'm not doing it. I have nothing further to say on it.

I would like to know the reasoning because you're an intelligent person and you made the best VR shooter I have seen, but if you don't want to say that is fair enough as well and I apologise if the question upset you.