Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Hopefully it gets fixed... I suspect it's just part of the whole bundle of problems surrounding station upgrades right now (disappearing cargo, etc.). Until then, all I can suggest is pausing the game before you upgrade stations, and then hunting down any trains that may have reversed direction as a result of the upgrade before unpausing.
Assuming you connect everything (like i do) that means all your trains will get new paths. And some of them end up on the wrong line.
What I'll just do now is make sure that there are plenty of signals set to one-way so that they'll at least not try to cross the entire map while on the wrong track. One train in the wrong place at the wrong time and my entire network locks up.
As time goes on the trains get longer and they may no longer be able to use the cross over because the train extends past the point of switching to the correct track
I don't often upgrade my stations though, and when I have it was early enough in the game, and I didn't have many trains on the network as it was, so not something that I had to deal with.
It really annoys me that upgrading a station does the equivalent of basically destroying the station and rebuilding it, tossing out all the cargo and passengers, as well as costing full price as though you're building the station from scratch, rather than just a partial price for adding a new bit of rail and a new platform or two to the station.
The situation was a double track between two towns withh a depot in the middle. The depot was connected both ways to it's near track and there was a point avaiable in both directions to transfer to the far track.
Trains running on the far track where using the depot's line transfer point to cross to the near track even though I had placed signals outside the stations to designate the correct trackk ofr them to use out and back.
I placed a new signal between the depot and the desitnation station (in fact very near the desitnation station) and the problem instantly rectified itself.
My conclusion is this:
* A train will try to arrive at the platform at it's destination station directly connected to the line it will then use when leaving it on it'sd return journey (so on a basic double track line it will want to cross over)
* To do so it will use the first point available that does not have a path signal further down the line instructing it otherwise. In my case this was the line transfer point by the depot half way between the towns.
* The train only seems to look at the signals facing it on it's own track - it does not appear to consider signals on the other line even if logically it should do so.
In this diagram thhe train should use the cross over points to arrive at plat form 1 (unless plat 1 is occupied).
<-----
=====================================||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Plat 1
..........................\\.//. (points)
..........................//.\\.
=====================================||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Plat 2
------>....X (signal)
In this diagram the train should pull into plat 2 and cross over after leaving the station (unless plat 2 is occupied)
<-----
=====================================||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Plat 1
..........................\\.//. (points)
..........................//.\\.
=====================================||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Plat 2
------>.....................................X (signal)