Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
For resources I've been pondering a method that would admittely only work on medium or hilly maps. Basically gate specific resources as a function of max elevation. For example, farm, food and refinery would only be in the bottom 1/4, smelter, tools, goods in the bottom half, timber, oil, quarry in the middle half, logs, coal in the upper half and iron in the top 1/4.
Just an example but a way to logically spread things out as a function of elevation, the exact values could be twiddled however made sense.
I don't see why it is "logical" to assign industried according to elvation - in particular for coal/iron.
Also, hill-farms are ideal for sheep and goats. Perhaps not in the US, but ecertainly un Europe and New Zealand.
Do you honestly think this will improve the locations of your industries?
It would be alot better then having oil wells at the bottom of mountains and oil refineries at its peak.