Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
On the one hand, focusing on a single character provides benefits, the primary one being that the person is (presumably) very good with that character, and can more or less make up for the characters weaknesses. This means that the person should, in theory, have consistently good performance with the champion and be helpful to the team regardless of the map or other factors.
On the other hand, sometimes variety is key. If someone mains a damage champion and plays that one almost exclusively, he doesn't have much experience with other champions, and if the team needs, say, a support, he won't be very good at playing that role. Probably true with flank and frontline as well.
And then there's the third option, of course, which is maining one or two champions but learning all classes, which is arguably the most difficult , but also most rewarding, option. I don't have any champions at level twenty, but I do have a level sixteen Willo (who I would consider my main) and a level twelve Maeve and Jenos with several other champions at or around level ten to eleven.
What I would wager is that you're seeing is the third option, at least in some cases. People with high account levels (I'm level seventy-five, IIRC) will naturally have higher champion level distributions, and they'll also have favorites. What you're likely seeing is those people's favorite champions, but they will play others if the situation calls for it.
As an aside, for matchmaking, I'm not sure that you always get paired with people around your account/skill level. I've been paired (as a level 67) with someone who was level 115. I've also gotten into at least one match with a Grandmaster (I'm unranked) and several games with at least two Masters and a Diamond on the other team. So you're not actually guaranteed to be in games with people who are close to your account level.
but again it won't take rank into account at all, ive had matches where i'm the only ranked (Silver 2, not great but not bad either haven't really played much of that really) or there could be 4 master ranked players on the other side so it might feel lopsided but the base system works, the problem is you don't get matchmaking based on ranked score in arcade modes only level
The best thing you can do is play with every champion and get good with as much as you can.
(My english is bad, i know)
This is why "One hit wonder" not work very well.
If you know. Top tier players will not play "One hit wonder". They will played Flex as possible.
I recommend to try all Champions and pick 3 - 4 champions each role to play. because you will know to counter, you will know champion machanic, you will know when to pick offensive or defensive champ or even Draft strategy.