Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
it's the same size as the orange / regular tiger and located in an odd location too...
There shouldn't be a 1 weapon fits all scenarios. In my opinion, if Archers can counter 2 handed weapon users then it's working as intended. A player can carry a shield and another weapon with them on their hotbar, and switch to 2 hander when they get within range.
Oh I get that, but the player only has so many rolls to try and dodge the arrows. I'd be fine if it was tight and if you mess up a couple rolls your dead. Then, the bow still counters the two-handed user. But as it stands, the bots have too good of aim. There's no refuting that.