so male genitals is okay but female only hair?

[Chocoyote]

you cant fool me.. its only hairs so female genitals are only hairs makes sense but making male genitals with pyhsics is all good and fine?

if you have the guts to do them naked at least do it right and make it visible and not just hairs it should be at least somewhat visible.

[hotzeus1]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZehW91Nizdo

[Deacon the destroyer]

Despite your opinion on the matter, isn't it nice a fun thread is on top

[SFG]

This Sounds like you wanna catch some slaves and have Personal fun with them? The Sun seems to burn out the last part of brain -:)

[Badmagic]

The real question is, will we be able to braid each others pubic hair... Will there be vajazzling with glitter, you know, the important things in life?

[Mr Potato]

I'd settle for a Hyborian style hyena tooth and ostrich feather vajazzle kit, maybe use a few of those crystals too.

Not much else to use in the desert alas.

[Отиум]

LOL

Well. Funcom did spend some of their development time making this fully 3D and physics enabled ding-a-ling, so you know what, yes, they should absolutely spend some time on the ladyparts as well. There's no reason for it to be just a blurry texture and some hair.

+1

[Rdizz]

Badmagic님이 먼저 게시:

The real question is, will we be able to braid each others pubic hair... Will there be vajazzling with glitter, you know, the important things in life?

Let's recap shall we. New words/phrases I've learned from this thread.

"Meat curtains"
"Meat wallet"
And let's not forget....

Vajazzling.

[Mr Potato]

Did you enjoy typing vajazzle into google?

[AngelofAnger]

this post was so productive and educational.

[Rdizz]

Mr Potato님이 먼저 게시:

Did you enjoy typing vajazzle into google?

I did, and ordered the vajazzling kit.

[seriousthree]

OK, as you now have this huge thread I checked on my female character - purely for scientific reasons. I also checked a female archer who just happens to have somehow lost her leggings. In both cases there are obvious lips visible, about as much as you would see on a real life woman. That makes this thread fairly irrelivant - both sexes are about as lifelike as they could make them given the limits of the U4 engine.

The bit that is actually missing is hard ons...

[seriousthree]

BTW anyone found a razor? :p

[Mr Potato]

Look, if I want my character to have an enormous camel toe while sporting a pair of hyena skin shorts then I have the right to ask for it!

[Skeldarkday]

Use your imagination. I assume you have one? For men well it's has good as it gets.

[Where's my tiara?]

Spindle님이 먼저 게시:

The person in charge of all models is female, so you're probably not gonna get real breast physics in most animations or anything else you're asking for.

At least the breast physics aren't absurd where they jiggle in different directions (Skyforge). And speaking of Funcom, in their previous Conan game, only the female models were ever naked if I recall (I could be wrong, this was like 7 years ago)

Either way, it's a good effort put forth so far for both character models, in my opinion at least. Perhaps in the future there will be more customizable options to make our in-game avatars more unique.

It would be pretty boring if all male characters had "God-like" genitalia and all female characters had p0rn star attributes. With still another year or so of development perhaps they will cater to what their playerbase are looking for.