Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"Damage removes sappers" isn't main/core/original stat of Homewrecker.
"+100% damage vs buildings" and "-25% damage vs players" are original stats of Homewrecker.
Will Homewrecker work without "Damage removes sappers" stat?
Yes, because that stat wasn't original part of the weapon.
Also, that stat on the homewrecker was added only 2 months after the weapon was released. It's been the core stat for 14 years.
Hello. Any kind of combo can shut down a single player. Claiming a weapon that is only useful in a combo is OP is a bit daft.
If it were your spy 1v1 versus pyro with homewrecker, the homewrecker is a downgrade.
No, but you should consider the balancing scenario from a 1v1 perspective. Look at the argument below...
Your complaint about the homewrecker is backed up with the scenario of a lone spy trying to take out a full freakin team guarding a sentry nest.
You have a team, perhaps you wait for your heavy to round the corner before you go for the nest, maybe the heavy comes with a medic (cos combos are powerful) and your 1v2 is now a 3v2 in your favour.
Snipped the rest cos it's the same.
You can't balance weapons based on uneven teams.
L'etranger from the start was designed with decreasing cloak managment.
Homewrecker from the start was designed with destroying enemy buildings built by enemy engineers.