Team Fortress 2
It astonishes me how ignorant some people are.
I was playing as spy in a match when a pyro used the Homewrecker on a sapper when I had already killed the engineer. I got salty and told the pyro that the homewrecker is unfair and that he shouldn't have a weapon that hard counters spy when pyro can already do that naturally. He replies saying that pyro should be able to do this and that "this is TEAM fortress 2."
What? He's saying that the weapon with virtually no downsides to the pyro is good for team play? One that can counter the last thing spy can do against the engineer? One that limits options and nullifies one of the most core class interactions in the game, spy vs engie? For a class that is already limited in use? THAT is healthy for the game? I think that thought is stupid!
< >
กำลังแสดง 1-15 จาก 43 ความเห็น
Odd you're getting mad that a pyro chose to hit your sapper instead of you, which its weak against non-buildings.
Spy is bad against pyro
Pyro wearing homewrecker is severely handicapping himself (and his team as the result). He could use Powerjack and be much more efficient battle wise.
you got so mad because a pyro destroyed your sapper once that you decided to make a thread about it?
Pyro is a positional class, it makes sense he’s also near an engineer, which makes it necessary to protect him and his buildings. Spy relies on awareness and mistakes, he is considerably weak in combat. Your better using demo or an uber charge.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Mina; 22 ธ.ค. 2023 @ 10: 22am
I like the interaction between Engi, Spy and Pyro (and Heavy, to some extent), but the Homewrecker is overkill. Usually, it's not needed, and only serves to annoy Spies though.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Fireschlong #2Broke4MannUp; 22 ธ.ค. 2023 @ 10: 19am
The pyro did excellent.
Weeaboos deserve no quarter, you should've been kicked for playing spy.
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย padmé:
Pyro is a positional class, it makes sense he’s also near an engineer, which makes it necessary to protect him and his buildings. Spy relies on awareness and mistakes, he is considerably weak in combat.
Indeed he relies on mistakes, but the Homewrecker nullifies the mistakes the Engineer makes of not noticing the spy, not killing the spy, and being killed himself. How is that fair on the spy's part?
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Guilion:
The pyro did excellent.
Weeaboos deserve no quarter, you should've been kicked for playing spy.
I'm not a weeb
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย mothwrm:
you got so mad because a pyro destroyed your sapper once that you decided to make a thread about it?
This has happened countless times.
homewrecker isn't really needed as the engineer should focus on the gun and you removing the spy

if the engie gets stabbed then you probably weren't watching the gun/nest to begin with
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Mcfighter2:
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย mothwrm:
you got so mad because a pyro destroyed your sapper once that you decided to make a thread about it?
This has happened countless times.
plus what was the pyro being ignorant of exactly? your feelings when he broke the sapper?
was he supposed to unequip it as soon as you joined the game because it makes you angry?
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Mcfighter2:
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย padmé:
Pyro is a positional class, it makes sense he’s also near an engineer, which makes it necessary to protect him and his buildings. Spy relies on awareness and mistakes, he is considerably weak in combat.
Indeed he relies on mistakes, but the Homewrecker nullifies the mistakes the Engineer makes of not noticing the spy, not killing the spy, and being killed himself. How is that fair on the spy's part?

Since its a team based game someone corrected his mistake, albeit a pyro no longer in combat and positioned away from the battle. In your part someone could utilize a damaged nest or have made a small advance to finish. In other words teammwork I suppose.
mmmmm I love babysitting engineers and making the life of the weakest class in the game even worse
i am using homewrecker to kill enemy engis and their buildings
< >
กำลังแสดง 1-15 จาก 43 ความเห็น
ต่อหน้า: 1530 50

วันที่โพสต์: 22 ธ.ค. 2023 @ 10: 08am
โพสต์: 43