Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Edit : You gotta work harder for those clown awards buddy.
most tf2 fans to this day act like OW is a carbon copy of TF2 despite the glaring differences between them, yes OW was a copy of TF2, but it has changed, and instead of attempting to see that, they instead review bomb and complain on that games forums.
i've played both games for me to get a general gist of both, and to be completely honest, OW2 is in a much better state then TF2 (community not included), OW2 has a functioning competitive, a reliable stream of updates, a reliable and predictable game loop for comp, a working and "balanced" hero system, and constant (actually good) bug fixes.
(yes, i know 30 hours is """bad""" but its enough time to understand a game and enjoy it (for some reason the tf2 community thinks otherwise))
also the point about the past drama is pretty bad, as you should always keep bad drama in your head when it comes to stuff like this, but i agree with the reviewing point, when reviewing a game, you review the GAME, not whatever the dev's did, i wouldnt review a game like omori then scream and shout in the review about the dev potentially being a predator, thats just dumb.