Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
*deep breath*
Well people dis like them because they both have things that people say because they got killed by them (example: "Oh you bodyshotting noob!" or "Facestab 0 skills all luck) Plus they both are played by squeakers and new players while also being two of the most edgiest classes in the world. Don't forget, spy has many weapons that give him a bad name.
TACTICAL EDGE LORD INCOMING! BAWOOP BAWOOP BAWOOP BAWOOP BAWOOP BAWOOP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXTJlH7g0tw
BOOOOOOOOOOOOM!
(for both spy and sniper)
1. No. Spy actually does contribute to the team
2. Those mechanics are balanced, whether it be through the spies mechanics or through other classes mechanics which counteract that mechanic.
3. Or spy. Or soldier. Or demo. Or even a Backburner pyro. You're making out like the sniper is standing 2000 feet away and they are impossible to get too.
4. Subjectivity and that isn't true.