Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Depends on your motherboard and what it can fit, but you're gonna struggle to find a decent card at that budget. Maybe a GTX 1050 2GB, but only if you're lucky and can find one on sale.
pls
Value?
It's a damn good upgrade from a i3 540.
let's say i've moved out from great britain. what do you have to say now? nothing productive and contributing i suppose.
I'm not saying we're not a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ too, but at least we managed to purge most of our scum to Grimsby/Glasgow
Also:
I'd recommend an i5 6600k if you can afford it. Will produce fantastic framerates on any Source game, and won't bottleneck elsewhere. Excellent quality for an i5; what the i7 6700/7700 are based off.
Dx90 2639 frames 14.186 seconds 186.03 fps ( 5.38 ms/f) 10.907 fps variability
Your GPU does something in a game that runs on the Source engine
Your GPU handles particle effects in TF2. That's literally it. Hence why the rest of the time I could churn out a consistent 200, but would bottleneck so hard I'd hit 50 if I looked at a medibeam.
And I STILL killed it as pocket scout
I would say a Navidia GTX 780 ti or up
Even though I don't have one I have heard its very good. If you'r wondering I have a gts 250(don't get it,it's not worth it)