vr chat epression for vr chat plus really!?

[Spyro91RepDragoCrosshair]

i was hoping the update will be awesome so i can have face expression when i have a webcam that my laptop has it. so the new update came out and i was very excited, until my excited crash like a meme like i saw the face expressions but theirs a problem a big major one.... WHAT THE FLIP IS PEACE OF TRASH IS ON A FLIPPING PAYWALLL!! i thought my dream come true so i can do face and hand movements but is on a flipping paywall!!

we thought pc users can be compete with vr head users. and no is on a darn paywall i hate vr plus i know you need money and you can put a pawall with the flipping drones but face expression for pc users really this is disgusting..... great more headset users will kick me i am so disappointed vr devs....

[N.GinWorks]

If money is the one who speaking, I guess they want to justify the VRC+ price.

Didn't say I'm fan of it either though.

[Fenix]

"This feature is in Early Access for subscribers, although it's extremely likely that it will become a general-access feature later."
Funny dialogue for this feature is unoptimized and buggy and the reality is money makes the world go around which helps fund development of the feature to make it optimized and actually reasonably good for the normies.

Not saying I'm a fan of it but I am saying I know how coding is well enough to accept this, assuming they do have an actual release of it later down the line when it functions better.
We'll just have to see of course. Will definitely improve my opinion of them if it's released a couple years down the road.

[Spyro91RepDragoCrosshair]

Originally posted by Fenix:

"This feature is in Early Access for subscribers, although it's extremely likely that it will become a general-access feature later."
Funny dialogue for this feature is unoptimized and buggy and the reality is money makes the world go around which helps fund development of the feature to make it optimized and actually reasonably good for the normies.

Not saying I'm a fan of it but I am saying I know how coding is well enough to accept this, assuming they do have an actual release of it later down the line when it functions better.
We'll just have to see of course. Will definitely improve my opinion of them if it's released a couple years down the road.

i hope so because i am sometimes not very patience but i hop your right. will have to see but serous;y pc user need it is not me everyone should have a chance.

[Felkuro]

And here you are again, with another post on the same topic.

Not that i will have need of this feature, or see the need to invest resources into this.
But you are just gonna have to wait. You can stay a "stone" for now, as you said in your other post.

[Spyro91RepDragoCrosshair]

Originally posted by Felkuro:

And here you are again, with another post on the same topic.

Not that i will have need of this feature, or see the need to invest resources into this.
But you are just gonna have to wait. You can stay a "stone" for now, as you said in your other post.

Did you say stone?! DID I HERE ROCK AND STONE!!
Yes I agree but many comments in YouTube are not happy about it right now.

https://youtu.be/CHt6VsK9STk

I am ok they can put a drone on a paywall but this is not what had in mind

[JohnnyGoblin]

Originally posted by Fenix:

"This feature is in Early Access for subscribers, although it's extremely likely that it will become a general-access feature later."
Funny dialogue for this feature is unoptimized and buggy and the reality is money makes the world go around which helps fund development of the feature to make it optimized and actually reasonably good for the normies.

Not saying I'm a fan of it but I am saying I know how coding is well enough to accept this, assuming they do have an actual release of it later down the line when it functions better.
We'll just have to see of course. Will definitely improve my opinion of them if it's released a couple years down the road.

I dont see how mentioning the code being either incomplete or still needing refinement would mean to monetize *that* version. Surely you would be wanting as many in *for* the refinement process for the code and then once it is in a very strong position is when you would be charging for it

[N.GinWorks]

Originally posted by JohnnyGoblin:

Originally posted by Fenix:

"This feature is in Early Access for subscribers, although it's extremely likely that it will become a general-access feature later."
Funny dialogue for this feature is unoptimized and buggy and the reality is money makes the world go around which helps fund development of the feature to make it optimized and actually reasonably good for the normies.

Not saying I'm a fan of it but I am saying I know how coding is well enough to accept this, assuming they do have an actual release of it later down the line when it functions better.
We'll just have to see of course. Will definitely improve my opinion of them if it's released a couple years down the road.

I dont see how mentioning the code being either incomplete or still needing refinement would mean to monetize *that* version. Surely you would be wanting as many in *for* the refinement process for the code and then once it is in a very strong position is when you would be charging for it

Do tell, how many chance our input would be taken into consideration as free user? Because to be honest if I were them and did allow everyone to test that feature...

I only pay mind to those who either have plenty of play hours, content creator, and ironically the paying member. I just gonna be blunt here, pretty sure free user would freak out more in their opinion than giving actual feedback.