Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"The weapon equipped in the off-hand will always incur a -50% damage penalty."
Dual Wield is still more damage than you would if you only wield 1 one handed weapon. Dual Wield is useful for procs and extra backstab damage.
Like I known that u got lesser damage from off hand but I'm talking about visible debuff when u got two weapons and hover at damage after all buff to damage there's - 50%danage reduction to damage doesn't matter class race nothin.
This is how it's lookin when u equip off hand weapon. When u unequip this debuff isn't there anymore. It's everytime u equip any kind of weapon to offhand. And it doesn't mean u got your offhand damage reduced but your overall damage. Like lvl 14 rogue is now doing 80 back stab damage.
Dude honestly u re talking about something totally different. Try to make rogue dual wielding and get to act two to got some decent gear that u have like 100-150 damage and then come and tell me I'm wrong when u ll be doin 90 damage from backstab instead of 300+. The offhand damage reduction never been issue in this thread at all. Everybody knows about it. I'm talking about main damage overall bein decreased by 50% not offhand.
My lvl 16 rogue:
1 handed damage = 119-125
Dual Wield damage = 192-203
One Handed Damage Backstab = 266
Dual Wield Backstab = 288 + 139
The damage in your picture looks small because that is the base damage of your weapons BEFORE all the other bonuses are applied, your total damage = your base weapon damage plus every other bonus such as finesse, warfare, dual wield and gear.
Dual wielding applies to your base damage, while warfare multiplies all physical damage after any other bonus. So the 5% increase in warfare is worth more than the 5% increase in dual wielding.
I already did that. The damage didn't change at all. It change in numbers a bit but not in damage dealt to enemies. Like the damage wnt to like 200 and the damage dealt was 94 overall with backstab after both daggers hit. Like the last patch ♥♥♥♥♥♥ even my saved games. My lvl 20 rogue went from 1100 base damage and 3127 per backstab to 750 per backstab. 80 agility.
If you look in the engine the average hit multiplier is 100. Most of the one-handed weapon are around 67 (daggers are lower since you're supposed to backstab with it) so 67+(67*0.5) = 100. Two handed weapons are around 100 so you do approximately the same damage when you're dual wielding compared to two handed.
Dude are tryin to say that the damage with my max finesse warfare build was negative? Cmon dude like really. As I told u before I know about offhand -50% damage. And that is not what Im talkin about for ♥♥♥♥ sake. IM |TALKIN ABOUT OVERALL damage.
When u have 200 base damage and 225% damage multiplier for rogue u should be doin around 500+ damage not 94..... I dont know how to make it mroe clear
80Finesse 15 warrfare 1127 base damage doin 659 damage per hit backstab without enemy havin any physical resistances
....