How good is the story/lore in 2?

[Arthur]

So I tried playing the first Divinity like three times, but dropped it in all of them because eventually I felt unmotivated to play since the story and lore were either non-existent, or very generic. Is D:OS2 better in this aspect?

For reference, my favorite RPG is Pillars of Eternity, exactly because of this aspect.

[[p] [RATS] Rea[p]er]

Dunno, I play for the combat. I feel like it has taken me about 3 playthroughs to grasp some of the more minor aspects of the lore. Which I guess is both a positive and negative. On the one hand it suggests there is a lot of depth, and it isn't being shoved down your throat.

On the other, you have to personally do a LOT of reading, of the books and notes and letters you come across, not just skim them.

[LukanGamer]

Make sure to say DoS or Divinity Sin or something since Divinity is its set (ie dragon comander and original 2 Divinities way back)

But impossible to say for each person different, good on you for stating a reference though.
Best way I can say personally:

Pillars 1 I found even worse then DoS 1 since least DoS 1 had the whole 2 people unique mechanic + story that was clearly designed for 2 people especially couples but still unique and cool for rp, though gave up on both before finishing.
(DoS 1 I gave up on because of trash handling of companions->like 1 gal betrayal handling was 1 the worst I ever seen and pillars because they felt lifeless ZZ with boring side content).

But both Pillars 2 and DoS 2 improved successfully both areas and I liked them both (Found Pillars 2 way better in character + story, but DoS 2 better in gameplay and playing GM mode for a time).

[Arroba]

It's more than BEST .

[Kroma]

Problem with DOS1 is, there are a lot of text, so you have to read a lot to understand what is going on in the world, and it doesnt really feel engaging. Unlike DOS2 where they managed to create a story which is way better in that aspect, a lot of the world building is experienced and not read, the humor is way better than in DOS1, i mean the kid with the shark story is hilarious. There are still a lot to read but not mandatory to understand the main plot, still the world building is really good and you can find a lot of back story if you look for it, specially for side characters you encounter.
In conclusion, i had a really hard time with DOS1 story/lore and spacing, while i really enjoyed DOS2.

[Highrule -1]

Neither game is strong in the story department. DOS1 has a generic story with poorly-paced lore dumps, DOS2's story can be summarized with "everybody's an arsehole", including the characters you play as.

[Arroba]

Originally posted by Highrule -1:

Neither game is strong in the story department. DOS1 has a generic story with poorly-paced lore dumps, DOS2's story can be summarized with "everybody's an arsehole", including the characters you play as.

You fail and lose .

[Praxis]

Both DOS 1 and 2 are a terrific fantasy romp. Writing is on point and voice acting in 2 is often take a step back to listen good. Not going to change your life but it's exactly what you'd expect from a TT gaming campaign. All the lurid weirdness and more if you can suspend disbelief.

[Sgt. Paulto]

Originally posted by Praxis:

Both DOS 1 and 2 are a terrific fantasy romp. Writing is on point and voice acting in 2 is often take a step back to listen good. Not going to change your life but it's exactly what you'd expect from a TT gaming campaign. All the lurid weirdness and more if you can suspend disbelief.

So you're telling me the quality is as good as some rando drunk guy ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ around with his friends? ... Funny, but not really the kinda quality story that I'm looking for.

[Arthur]

Originally posted by Praxis:

Both DOS 1 and 2 are a terrific fantasy romp. Writing is on point and voice acting in 2 is often take a step back to listen good. Not going to change your life but it's exactly what you'd expect from a TT gaming campaign. All the lurid weirdness and more if you can suspend disbelief.

Well... Having played DOS1 I can't say I agree. The writing isn't bad, but its not stellar or memorable, honestly.

[Damphair]

Playing DOS for the story is like paying a hooker for a hug.

[Arthur]

Originally posted by Draglord:

Playing DOS for the story is like paying a hooker for a hug.

LMAO. Oh well, I guess its not my thing, then. I'm a sucker for good stories, its what I'm looking for when I get into a new RPG/CRPG :b

[xat.com/flirt]

it's honestly kind of ♥♥♥♥. braccus rex to everything. they couldn't of come up with a new villain for the 2nd? idk... it felt kind of tacky. not enough variety to it. the writing is okay, but the lore isn't very expansive and feels kind of redundant. i guess it's hard to randomly make up your own game with it's own lore, but still. the good news is with baldurs gate 3 they will be adopted already made good lore, so it shouldn't be a problem in that game

[Arroba]

Originally posted by Draglord:

Playing DOS for the story is like paying a hooker for a hug.

Go to counterstrike .

[Janthis]

Not too great, honestly. It's an improvement over DOS1, but it still feels like the writers couldn't decide whether they wanted to joke around or be serious, and then some parts get too dark. The ending felt unsatisfying to many people as well. Much like the Dark Souls series or Elden Ring, this is a game you enjoy for the gameplay rather than story.

[Arthur]

Originally posted by Johnny_B_80:

Not too great, honestly. It's an improvement over DOS1, but it still feels like the writers couldn't decide whether they wanted to joke around or be serious, and then some parts get too dark. The ending felt unsatisfying to many people as well. Much like the Dark Souls series or Elden Ring, this is a game you enjoy for the gameplay rather than story.

Dark Souls has one of the best lores in gaming, what?