Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
Regardless, the characters aren't real people, so you can just imagine any reason they're sexually attracted to the player who wants the romance option. Make something up. It can be different in each playthrough; it doesn't have to be that everyone is bisexual every time.
Yeah, see I tried saying that already. Didn't take.
Ancient Greeks did not associate sexual relations with binary labels, as modern Western society does. Men who had male lovers were not identified as homosexual, and may have had wives or other female lovers. See Homosexuality in ancient Greece. Ancient Greek religious texts, reflecting cultural practices, incorporated bisexual themes. The subtexts varied, from the mystical to the didactic.
Spartans thought that love and erotic relationships between experienced and novice soldiers would solidify combat loyalty and unit cohesion, and encourage heroic tactics as men vied to impress their lovers. Once the younger soldiers reached maturity, the relationship was supposed to become non-sexual, but it is not clear how strictly this was followed. There was some stigma attached to young men who continued their relationships with their mentors into adulthood.[1] For example, Aristophanes calls them euryprôktoi, meaning "wide arses", and depicts them like women.The Theban Band, a military of male couples, may have been organized according to the same idea.
That's from Wikipedia, friend.
Not even covering ancient Rome, either.
Which OH NO, brings me b ack the the point that THIS IS A ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ GAME AND WHAT IS NORMAL IN OUR WORLD DOESN'T APPLY HERE.
The only thing those studies proved was that if you traumatize a baby and treat them like a girl even as they resist and fight because they're a boy you just create a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up boy.
Regardless, studies like that are illegal, so.
And again what i've been trying to get across to you the entire time, is that how the real world works does matter, because that's the scale with which we explain everything. The reason why spells and ♥♥♥♥ isn't a problem is because it doesn't exist so it doesn't cause an issue, everybody being be isn't an issue per se it's just odd 'cause taht's nor what we're used to. It's not even necessarly a problem if it's intorudced well too.
Taking you're red prince thinguy, you could imagine visiting a lizard city where your character witness a polygamist or gay couple and finds taht odd (representing our POV or if you prefer the POV of the real world) and the red prince explaining that it's the natural state of thing for him.
If it's done like that i have no issue, i'm not disagreeing that you should choose the orientation of the character you control, just that the other character being defined and having a backstory should not be fluid on that subject because taht would essentially be bad writting.
Honestly i'm not sure if i'm getting my point accross very well, but essentially all i want is not play a game where devs think that wrtting a different sexuality is just checking something in a checklist saying "yep we got a gay guy".
Other than that go nuts
And again i hope i explained myself better this time