Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also, which version are you on? I know in Heart of Darkness that the only "Supply Consumption" that matters is the score given by your ruling party's military policy (the more militaristic they are, the more military score you have). This means the only way you can have a massive fluctuation in military score without building or disbanding units is to change ruling parties to someone with a different military policy.
Also that's a puny navy. No wonder your military power isn't as high as you'd like.
I don't know if it's important, but I don't play vanilla, I use the Pop Demand Mod (Pop Of Darkness version).
Lembley42 also informed me that Germany is actually very weak in the second half of the game due to a lack of coasts, the later stages are very Navy focused rather than Army focused according to him. This makes sence as on land combat width is continually narrowing, army sizes continually rising and defence increasingly surperior to offence. A lack of coasts means a lack of naval bases and a lack of naval bases means a lack of naval supply limit, which in turn means a lack of ships.