The game is dying :(

[Kubiasty]

1:24 PM SUNDAY and no one playing .. .8 / 150 players people on server.. last night SATURDAY 50 players / 150 .... GIVE us HORSES AND CANONS untill the game will die totally !!!!! :(((

[xBCxRangers]

Needs a third person mode, bot mode, port to consoles, cross platform play.

[RatBoat]

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:

Needs a third person mode, bot mode, port to consoles, cross platform play.

Maybe console and cross platform but third person and not mode... No

[RatBoat]

I mean yesterday four servers were full

[xBCxRangers]

Originally posted by 30thVA2Lt.BearHunter:

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:

Needs a third person mode, bot mode, port to consoles, cross platform play.

Maybe console and cross platform but third person and not mode... No

Well first where we agree, porting gives the devs access to Game Pass, where on that, you have both console and pc players, being game pass is on both.

In addition, with that, you'll almost never run out of players, being it's free on game pass. The Devs would likely get revenue from Microsoft. Add it on PS, and it could get hyped as a "cross platform civil war", which could interest folks.

The Bot Mode (which is a mode, not in the main game) is something that could give players who are maybe new, or older, or younger, or don't otherwise want to integrate into the MP very quickly, or at all, an outlet to play the game.

After a day of work, or school, folks may not be in the mood for chat, or otherwise competition, but maybe just want to jump in to a simple line fight across all the maps in a simple fight.

Doesn't have to be fancy, say a 12 v 12, where the system like the game Darkest of Days (don't know what else to compare it to) moves you up to the line, and the fight ensues you with the AI team and the enemy. It could act as a tutorial of sorts, but an outlet for those who are not into MP.

Third Person. That could also be on the SP Mode, with just an over the shoulder view. Games like this, folks may want to see the historical uniforms, and their characters. Again, it doesn;t have to be portion to the main game, but again, an outlet.

I think the game would do much better if these were integrated.

[[6thAL.I] Pfc Emperror steve]

Originally posted by 14thLAPvt.Kubiasty_PL:

1:24 PM SUNDAY and no one playing .. .8 / 150 players people on server.. last night SATURDAY 50 players / 150 .... GIVE us HORSES AND CANONS untill the game will die totally !!!!! :(((

the game is not dying ive seen lots of matches (public) up all week ive actually been in them well over 100 people on atleast 2 occasions

on top of that ive seen events all weekend with regiments aswell as public matches

and plus we are not too far away with artillery being added as they are only fixing bugs with them now and because of them adding horses to arty they have cut time in half for cavalry which means cavalry could be here sooner than we expect

[Eagle]

Indeed I can attest to this 2 full rooms a third near full and a 4th with 20 to 30 people just the other day. Some people take break from the game then play later. When you say 2pm do you mean US time? Central Eastern Pacific what? Cause during the day time on Central time there are far more players than later evening closing in on Midnight central time people start dropping off and by 4am Central youll be lucky to find a match with more than 8 people.

Thats been my experience in the month or so Ive been playing I usually get on about midnight or so and play till about 3 or 4. by then its so dead there is no match its just boring then (Sometimes) because when it starts to get dead is when the Shenanigans start with Parlay and sitting and chatting with the enemy at the church before someone nit wit destroys the truce and kills all 4 of you lol.

Good times.

[Casual Friday]

Just picked this game up. I played once with around 120 players. Had loads of fun. Great game... Tried to play for the last couple of days. less than 30 people playing. Makes the game not worth playing. Ill give it a couple of weeks, then im going to request a refund.

[Kubiasty]

In this game should be more action.. because its little boring... ;/ need horses, canons, some forts.. siege forts would be awesome with canons... battles..

[Hinkel]

Originally posted by 14thLAPvt.Kubiasty_PL:

In this game should be more action.. because its little boring... ;/ need horses, canons, some forts.. siege forts would be awesome with canons... battles..

As you can see, its in progress :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_g2kqeWc6A

Also cavalry:

https://steamcdn-a.akamaihd.net/steamcommunity/public/images/clans/25965595/960ab701ae660c0bce8aedc36456d18cd70207d8.jpg

https://steamcdn-a.akamaihd.net/steamcommunity/public/images/clans/25965595/874474792a3001cbc98d61ee78ef172b3d92499f.jpg

[[CG]Chaplain Bradley]

Originally posted by 14thLAPvt.Kubiasty_PL:

siege forts would be awesome with canons... battles..

War of Rights is based upon the Maryland Campaign of the Summer of 1862 of the American Civil War.

[[6thAL.I] Pfc Emperror steve]

Originally posted by Chaplain Bradley:

Originally posted by 14thLAPvt.Kubiasty_PL:

siege forts would be awesome with canons... battles..

War of Rights is based upon the Maryland Campaign of the Summer of 1862 of the American Civil War.

i agree although im sure there was no fort sieges in this campaign it would be cool if they did a siege dlc and dare i say a naval campaign dlc in the future as i would love to see them both

but normally players start playing after 8pm british till like 3 am british time thats ur best chance of finding a decent sized match

[Eagle]

Originally posted by CGHinkel:

Originally posted by 14thLAPvt.Kubiasty_PL:

In this game should be more action.. because its little boring... ;/ need horses, canons, some forts.. siege forts would be awesome with canons... battles..

As you can see, its in progress :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_g2kqeWc6A

Also cavalry:

https://steamcdn-a.akamaihd.net/steamcommunity/public/images/clans/25965595/960ab701ae660c0bce8aedc36456d18cd70207d8.jpg

https://steamcdn-a.akamaihd.net/steamcommunity/public/images/clans/25965595/874474792a3001cbc98d61ee78ef172b3d92499f.jpg

We need Sow belly and Hardtack lol

WOW that video isnt the same one I saw you guys are doing AMAZING!! Keep it up boys.

[RatBoat]

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:

Originally posted by 30thVA2Lt.BearHunter:

Maybe console and cross platform but third person and not mode... No

Well first where we agree, porting gives the devs access to Game Pass, where on that, you have both console and pc players, being game pass is on both.

In addition, with that, you'll almost never run out of players, being it's free on game pass. The Devs would likely get revenue from Microsoft. Add it on PS, and it could get hyped as a "cross platform civil war", which could interest folks.

The Bot Mode (which is a mode, not in the main game) is something that could give players who are maybe new, or older, or younger, or don't otherwise want to integrate into the MP very quickly, or at all, an outlet to play the game.

After a day of work, or school, folks may not be in the mood for chat, or otherwise competition, but maybe just want to jump in to a simple line fight across all the maps in a simple fight.

Doesn't have to be fancy, say a 12 v 12, where the system like the game Darkest of Days (don't know what else to compare it to) moves you up to the line, and the fight ensues you with the AI team and the enemy. It could act as a tutorial of sorts, but an outlet for those who are not into MP.

Third Person. That could also be on the SP Mode, with just an over the shoulder view. Games like this, folks may want to see the historical uniforms, and their characters. Again, it doesn;t have to be portion to the main game, but again, an outlet.

I think the game would do much better if these were integrated.

The game is built to be multiplayer only if we make a bot mode everyone will play that and it will really die also thrid person on the battlefield means you don't have to risk your life and peak

[xBCxRangers]

Originally posted by 30ThVA2Lt.BearHunter:

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:

Well first where we agree, porting gives the devs access to Game Pass, where on that, you have both console and pc players, being game pass is on both.

In addition, with that, you'll almost never run out of players, being it's free on game pass. The Devs would likely get revenue from Microsoft. Add it on PS, and it could get hyped as a "cross platform civil war", which could interest folks.

The Bot Mode (which is a mode, not in the main game) is something that could give players who are maybe new, or older, or younger, or don't otherwise want to integrate into the MP very quickly, or at all, an outlet to play the game.

After a day of work, or school, folks may not be in the mood for chat, or otherwise competition, but maybe just want to jump in to a simple line fight across all the maps in a simple fight.

Doesn't have to be fancy, say a 12 v 12, where the system like the game Darkest of Days (don't know what else to compare it to) moves you up to the line, and the fight ensues you with the AI team and the enemy. It could act as a tutorial of sorts, but an outlet for those who are not into MP.

Third Person. That could also be on the SP Mode, with just an over the shoulder view. Games like this, folks may want to see the historical uniforms, and their characters. Again, it doesn;t have to be portion to the main game, but again, an outlet.

I think the game would do much better if these were integrated.

The game is built to be multiplayer only if we make a bot mode everyone will play that and it will really die also thrid person on the battlefield means you don't have to risk your life and peak

Well, if the rationale is "everyone will play the bot mode and kill it further", would mean, a bot mode would be popular. That's a good thing to have more people buy and play the game.

Would it kill a mp that's already relatively dead? Likely not. The key is, getting folks to play the game, no matter which mode they play.

As far as Third Person, i really can't see an issue of an over the shoulder view if one chooses.

The great thing about PC Gaming, is choice, in having various choices. And being the game can't be modded, the Devs should add more choices, and maybe more would play. I continue to see these "mp only" historical games....fail. And it's a shame.

[[1.USSS.F]Cpt. Karlsen]

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:

Originally posted by 30ThVA2Lt.BearHunter:

The game is built to be multiplayer only if we make a bot mode everyone will play that and it will really die also thrid person on the battlefield means you don't have to risk your life and peak

Well, if the rationale is "everyone will play the bot mode and kill it further", would mean, a bot mode would be popular. That's a good thing to have more people buy and play the game.

Would it kill a mp that's already relatively dead? Likely not. The key is, getting folks to play the game, no matter which mode they play.

As far as Third Person, i really can't see an issue of an over the shoulder view if one chooses.

The great thing about PC Gaming, is choice, in having various choices. And being the game can't be modded, the Devs should add more choices, and maybe more would play. I continue to see these "mp only" historical games....fail. And it's a shame.

- More than a game: War of Rights is a vision that keeps expanding its scale. The project is entirely crowdfunded and has been developed on for the past 6 years. We consider it more of an ever evolving artistic piece rather than a final product with a targeted release deadline with set features.

^ thats a public statement from the developers of war of right. Can be found if ones looks into what WOR is and are about before buying in on it.

In short war of rights are not about becoming millionaires or a AAA dev company. But to create something that the pople behind the game (and many others evidently) found where missing in this world.

Regarding you'r claim about a dying game, well numbers have only been going up. Along side the multiplude numbers of events.