安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
90 looks great!
Should be something there other than P->????????
You need to attached cheat engine to re7. It's a base address that pulls the active memory address when the the game is running. It only reads ??????? if you don't have cheat engine attached to re7. Follow the directions.
https://puu.sh/tHW2d/d6d0664db6.png
It was 07E7D7B8 4 bytes.
RE7 is a single player game. No reason for it to have VAC. No risk involved with this game.
http://i.imgur.com/WzWvNrS.png This is after attaching to cheat engine using the table above.
Using that method you'll have to rescan for that each time since the memory changes. I provided the base address that points to all those combinations. Try it again and see my post above. It's definitely working as my pictures show.
I've had cheat engine on my machine for years and have never received a vac ban. If you got one, you had cheat engine running when playing those games whether it was attached or not. No one on the cheat engine forum has ever received a ban just for having it on their machine.
The 2nd picture doesn't happen for me. After selecting re7.exe the address is never aquired and stays at ?????????.
Interesting. I haven't had much response on this since I posted it in different places, but if I find other people are having the same issue, I'll update the table and repost it. I can't really help with the issue since it's not happening on my end and I know I have the right pointer for the base address since it works correctly for me. In the mean time, you can use point scanner to find that address and narrow it down too if you like. We can compare our findings and see what the issue might be.
No.